Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Was the Georgetown Loop a poor engineering design?

November 17, 2008 10:15AM
Glen,

This is an issue I thought about quite a bit during my years at the Loop. I think the main reason switchbacks were not used between Georgetown and Silver Plume was that is was initially planned to be a through route between Denver and Leadville, and switchbacks are not conducive to mainline operations.
However, I also feel the point I've seen made that the terrain between Georgetown and Silver Plume could not accommodate a switchback (or switchbacks) is inaccurate. In fact, before the high bridge was rebuilt consideration was given to putting in a switchback to avoid the seemingly insurmountable (at the time) cost of the bridge. The topography in the area in fact offers an almost natural grade for a switchback between the Hall Tunnel area and what is now the Devils Gate terminal. So, the inevitable conclusion is the RR didn't want a switchback on their mainline and the Loop was born.

Phil
Subject Author Posted

Was the Georgetown Loop a poor engineering design?

gbrewer November 16, 2008 10:47AM

Re: Was the Georgetown Loop a poor engineering design?

Steve Dickey November 16, 2008 07:55PM

Re: Was the Georgetown Loop a poor engineering design?

Dan Robirds November 16, 2008 08:13PM

Re: Was the Georgetown Loop a poor engineering design?

PhilJ November 17, 2008 10:15AM

Re: Was the Georgetown Loop a poor engineering design?

GeorgeGaskill November 19, 2008 12:01PM

Re: Was the Georgetown Loop a poor engineering design?

hank November 20, 2008 11:25AM

Re: Was the Georgetown Loop a poor engineering design?

GeorgeGaskill November 20, 2008 11:50AM

Re: Was the Georgetown Loop a poor engineering design?

Mike Trent November 20, 2008 11:52AM

Georgetown Loop was a great engineering design?

up3985slrg1744 November 21, 2008 10:26AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login