Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: D&RGW renumbering

April 18, 2008 03:16AM avatar
Earl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am thinking the weight-based class designation
> was based on wieght upon drivers, not total engine
> wieght.


Nope, total wt of engine at original purchase.

Nobody's mentioned it yet but the 1924 classifications were type (C=Consolidationon, K=MiKado, T=Tenwheeler,etc) and tractive effort in 1,000 of pounds, rounded up. I.E.: C-16, 2-8-0 with 16,000 lbs T.E.; C-19, 2-8-0 with 19,000 lbs T.E.; T-12, 4-6-0 with 12,000 lbs T.E., etc.
Subject Author Posted

D&RGW renumbering

Ray Cadd April 15, 2008 10:55AM

Re: D&RGW renumbering

Rich Muth April 15, 2008 11:12AM

Re: D&RGW renumbering

Ray Cadd April 15, 2008 12:15PM

Re: D&RGW renumbering

Rich Muth April 15, 2008 12:28PM

Re: D&RGW renumbering

hank April 15, 2008 05:08PM

Re: D&RGW renumbering

Rich Muth April 15, 2008 07:20PM

Re: D&RGW renumbering

Jeff Taylor April 15, 2008 08:20PM

Re: D&RGW renumbering

Jerry Day April 16, 2008 08:28AM

Re: D&RGW renumbering

El Nehi April 16, 2008 07:00AM

Re: D&RGW renumbering

hank April 16, 2008 01:45PM

Re: D&RGW renumbering

Earl April 16, 2008 08:39PM

Re: D&RGW renumbering

hank April 17, 2008 10:14AM

Re: D&RGW renumbering

Herb Kelsey April 18, 2008 03:16AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login