Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 464

March 25, 2008 09:06AM avatar
I mentioned that above. Tractive effort does not change. TE is simply steam pushing against the pistons. Makes no matter if it is superheated or not. The differece becomes when underway, the superheated steam has much more potential energy and has much greater expansive properties, more work can be done with less steam, thereby reducing water consumption. The less water you use the less fuel burned to boil it to steam - everybody wins.

A superheated K-27 has the same 27,000 pounds of T.E that a saturated one has as the cylinders are the same size. As a compound, I think starting in compound, using the high pressure pistons to get underway, I they developed around 25,000 lb. T.E. as the steam was pressing against the smaller high pressure piston only. In simple, the high pressure cylinders are bypassed and the live steam flows directly into the low pressure cylinders, which are much larger. I've never figured this tractive effort, but it could be done easily if one has the cylinder size of the low pressure cylinders. I'm guessing this T.E. could be pushing 30,000 lbs. Remember the engineer was only supposed to start the train moving in simple and then change over to compound as soon as possible. This was a problem, because appearently the engineers like to leave the engines in simple too much.
Subject Author Posted

464

GFDMatt March 22, 2008 06:57PM

Re: 464

ANI March 22, 2008 07:20PM

Re: 464

Marty Knox March 23, 2008 06:30AM

Re: 464

GFDMatt March 23, 2008 07:35AM

Re: 464

John Cole March 23, 2008 07:42AM

Re: 464

BillD March 23, 2008 07:58AM

Re: 464

John Cole March 23, 2008 09:14AM

Re: 464

BillD March 23, 2008 01:40PM

Re: 464

Earl March 24, 2008 11:39AM

Re: 464

GFDMatt March 24, 2008 12:24PM

Re: 464

Bruce R. Pier March 24, 2008 02:27PM

Re: 464

GFDMatt March 24, 2008 03:19PM

Re: 464

Everett Lueck March 24, 2008 04:29PM

Re: 464

GFDMatt March 24, 2008 04:39PM

Re: 464

Festus March 25, 2008 08:47AM

Re: 464

Earl March 25, 2008 09:06AM

Re: 464

szuiderveen March 25, 2008 02:01PM

Re: 464

GFDMatt March 25, 2008 03:56PM

Re: 464

ANI March 24, 2008 04:53PM

Re: 464

ANI March 23, 2008 09:16AM

Re: 464

ANI March 23, 2008 09:53AM

Re: 464

chris ahrens March 24, 2008 07:44PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login