Re: Georgetown Merchants.

Al Patterson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Roger Hogan Wrote:
>
> > Also I agree my friend is part of the problem
> NOW
> > he put himself in that position when he opened
> his
> > store. My problem is when people include him
> > saying ALL the merchants deserve what they are
> > getting cuz they didn't help out the old
> operator.
> > That IMHO is plane BS. If the new folks were
> not
> > there they have nothing to do with the CHS
> > screwing the old operator and their employees.
>
> I see your point, but keep in mind your friend may
> have relied on the merchants who deserve their
> fate while doing his research prior to investing
> in said business. It is tough to make an informed
> decision when those giving you the information are
> lying, whether intentional or not.


You IMHO Al are correct. Here is there and has made his decision to be in business there so he has to do what ever he needs to do to make it work. My point was and is simple HE is not part of the cause of the problem he was not there. When people say the merchants there deserve the bad time cuz they didn't help the old operator is what I am saying is wrong the new merchants were not there when the CHS got rid of the old operator. I am not saying they would of been any different or they would of helped, no one knows that including them.