Over at the Clear Creek Courant's website, there is a new (8/8/2007) article on the loop. Here's a link to the article:
Clear Creek Courant: CHS seeks to boost Loop revenue, ridership
Key points of the article are:
(1) CHS has 3-year business plan to increase revenues and ridership.
(2) The CHS's plan says that the
CHS needs another $5.3 *million* in order
“to achieve a reliable core of equipment and to address years of deferred maintenance".
(3) Delivery of #1203 has been delayed until September.
(4) #111 should be ready at the beginning of next season.
(5) #1203 is 16,000 lbs --8 tons-- heavier than any other locomotive to have operated on the reconstructed loop.
(6) Because of #1203's weight, engineering firms are inspecting all the Loop's bridges.
Now, my commentary:
Anyone care to speculate how the "years of deferred maintenance" occurred? That doesn't seem possible to me, given that the current operator has only been on site for 3 years.
Also, I'm surprised that the structural analyses were not done sooner, preferrably *prior* to the purchase of #1203. Had #1203 been finished on time -- no offense intended to the SV guys -- and been shipped to Silver Plume on time, the CHS would have had a locomotive ready to go yet not know whether or not it was truly safe to operate her over the Loop's bridges. I wonder what came first: the CHS contracting for structural analyses *OR* Skip's publicly posting on here about his concern about #1203 being too heavy for the Loop's bridges?
Finally, somebody needs to update
the Georgetown Colorado website to link to the current article.
--
Chris Webster
[
www.speakeasy.org]