Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: What the builders said

March 12, 2001 01:09AM
El Coke,
I think that by 30 years they ment regular service life without the need of major repairs or replacement parts.
----
Keep in mind that many of these engines that are over 100 years old are not a powerful as they were when built, mainly due to running with reduced boiler pressure.
As these boilers age, aside from all the heatings and coolings, they will become more & more brittle. It is the nature of all grades of irons and steels (including stainless) to revert to it's natural soft iron state. Despite their best efforts even the Smithsonians' "preserved" engines one day (a few more centruies) will fall apart.
Of course it's also only a matter of time before all the 1800's original negatives become too deicate to reproduce. The silver nitride film stock from all the 1910s and 1920s is already falling apart while sitting in archives. Another 40 years and all those family films made in the 50s and 60s will be ready to cumble at the slighest touch. In a 150 years all the pictures we're taking now will be ready to die as well.
Even digital images are only good so long as you have the equipment to read the correct file formats. A CD can hold informaton for thousands of years, but who's still going to have a CD player in a 100 years?
What are the chances of any of the currently operting pieces of equipment to still be operable in a century? The Eureka's last day under steam will probably be to haul Dan's funeral train (in the distant future). How many miles will the K36's have on them by that time? Roaring Camps Heistler will be over 202 years old (and the one still a the Westside site a couple years older). Even with new boilers all the other parts will be getting fragile as well.
If anyone has memories on a video tape, and you want to keep them, I suggest you find a way to convert the tapes to digital because magnetic tapes have a life span of only about 7 to 15 years and then they begin to "forget".
Now how I went from enegine service life to a rant on our decaying history I'll never know. :-/
Andrew, Taylor, it's going to be a heavy burden for us young guys to keep the history alive in our twlight years.
Curtis F.
Subject Author Posted

Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

TNT March 10, 2001 08:43PM

Re: Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

Tim Smith March 10, 2001 10:36PM

Re: 110 years & counting!

Michael Allen March 10, 2001 11:55PM

101 slow and steady

Tom Shreve March 11, 2001 12:13AM

Re: Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

Mikky March 11, 2001 12:56AM

Re: Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

C.H.Irvin March 11, 2001 07:36AM

Re: Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

Bill Kepner March 11, 2001 05:02PM

Re: Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

Dan Markoff March 11, 2001 08:22AM

Re: Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

Earl Knoob March 11, 2001 09:39AM

Re: Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

Steffen Rosmus March 11, 2001 11:01AM

Re: Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

william March 11, 2001 10:02PM

Re: Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

Steffen Rosmus March 12, 2001 05:04AM

Re: Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

Taylor Rush March 11, 2001 01:38PM

Re: Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

Art Chase March 11, 2001 04:54PM

Re: Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

George March 11, 2001 11:39PM

What the builders said

El Coke March 11, 2001 10:41PM

Re: What the builders said

Curtis F. March 12, 2001 01:09AM

Re: What the builders said

Tom Shreve March 12, 2001 09:34AM

Re: What the builders said

Curtis F. March 12, 2001 10:00AM

Re: What the builders said

Steffen Rosmus March 13, 2001 12:55PM

Re: Another reason that small engines survived

Brian Norden March 13, 2001 07:58PM

Re: Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

Owen Chapman March 12, 2001 04:06AM

Re: Life Expectancy of Steam Locomotive?

Dan Markoff March 13, 2001 07:02AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.