November 14, 2006 09:13PM
I find the previous post very interesting and informative. I am sure that there are many issues involved here that need to be addressed. I do however think this agreement is a positive move in the right direction. I always think we achieve more with small steps than trying to overeach too fast. Lets all hope the other issues can be addressed in a satisfactory manner for all. I do understand monitoring the use of company logos however, but agree UP has some pretty badly marked up cars and stuff out there on the lines. I see them everytime a train rolls through. One wonders though if that could be addressed very efficiently consider that these cars set in rail yards alot of places and probably would be remarked within in a short time of being recleaned. Cities have had this problem for years.
Subject Author Posted

U.P. Licensing Issue Resolved-Off Topic

DaveB November 13, 2006 02:34AM

U.P. Licensing Issue Resolved-Off Topic

dand November 13, 2006 07:41AM

Re: U.P. Licensing Issue Resolved-Off Topic *LINK*

Rick Steele November 13, 2006 08:07AM

Re: U.P. Licensing Issue Resolved-Off Topic *LINK*

James November 13, 2006 09:45AM

MTH / UP et al

Dick Seelye November 13, 2006 04:39PM

Re: U.P. Licensing Issue Resolved-Off Topic

DaveB November 13, 2006 10:52PM

Re: U.P. Licensing Issue Resolved-Off Topic

Bill Scobie November 14, 2006 04:41AM

Re: U.P. Licensing Issue Resolved-Off Topic

DaveB November 14, 2006 09:13PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.