Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 463/497? That's up to CTSMC, Commission, and $$$$$

June 30, 2007 01:46PM avatar
Ironically I believe that out of all the K-37’s the 497 is the only one that has not had major boiler work done to it since the late 1920’s when it was converted to NG. Except of coarse the replacement of both flue sheets and crown knuckle done by the C&TS in I think 1994. The D&S also did some mud ring work under the fire door when they had it.

The 492 on the other hand had the barrel of the boiler replaced in the 1940’s according to it’s form 4. I believe it also got a fire box on that shopping.

The running gears of the K36 & K-37 are very similar. In the lean Kyle years of the 1980’s , the 484 acquired the drivers , driving boxes, shoes & wedges ext. of the 495 so that it could continue to use up boiler time with out spending a bunch of money the rail road didn’t have at the time.

Jack
Subject Author Posted

Just guessing

michael June 29, 2007 11:16AM

Re: Just guessing

John Craft June 29, 2007 12:34PM

Hey, Crauyft, None of This "Guessing" Stuff

Dick Cowles June 29, 2007 02:25PM

Re: Hey, Crauyft, None of This "Guessing" Stuff

michael June 29, 2007 03:38PM

Re: one loco

Fred T June 29, 2007 05:27PM

Why only one operable loco in 2003

Dick Cowles June 29, 2007 10:04PM

Re: Why only one operable loco in 2003

michael June 29, 2007 10:15PM

Re: Why only one operable loco in 2003

stuart olson June 29, 2007 11:27PM

Re: Why only one operable loco in 2003

AGreene June 30, 2007 08:37AM

Re: Why only one operable loco in 2003

michael June 30, 2007 09:31AM

Re: Why only one operable loco in 2003

Steve Stockham June 30, 2007 10:34AM

463/497? That's up to CTSMC, Commission, and $$$$$

Dick Cowles June 30, 2007 10:29AM

Oops; I meant "492" not "792"

Dick Cowles June 30, 2007 10:39AM

Re: 463/497? That's up to CTSMC, Commission, and $$$$$

michael June 30, 2007 10:55AM

Re: 463/497? That's up to CTSMC, Commission, and $$$$$

stuart olson June 30, 2007 12:29PM

Re: 463/497? That's up to CTSMC, Commission, and $$$$$

Jack Campbell June 30, 2007 01:46PM

Re: Hey, Crauyft, None of This "Guessing" Stuff

Jack Campbell June 30, 2007 09:57AM

Re: Hey, Crauyft, None of This "Guessing" Stuff

michael June 30, 2007 10:59AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login