Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Sitching problems Uintah Railway

c hawkins
January 22, 2001 12:21PM
I, too, have noticed this from all available photos. I assume you are referring to one-car passenger trains with a combine and one of the 20's as the locomotive.
My take on the situation is that unless the locomotive needed servicing other than water, the crew would have avoided uncoupling, because a shove with only one combine and a tank engine would be a cinch, and each time you break the air hose coupling, a full brake test is required with all operating rules I am aware of (although frequent complete brake tests before venturing down the steep URY grades would seem prudent to me anyway...I don't know what Uintah rules were).
Another consideration would be that a long shove downgrade with the locomotive on the uphill side would produce a rough ride for the passengers, hence the practice of turning before the stop rather that after. This is of course all speculation!
Subject Author Posted

Sitching problems Uintah Railway

Rodger Polley January 21, 2001 10:20AM

Re: Sitching problems Uintah Railway

c hawkins January 22, 2001 12:21PM

Re: SWitching problems Uintah Railway part deux

c hawkins January 22, 2001 12:41PM

Re: SWitching problems Uintah Railway part deux

Rodger Polley January 22, 2001 01:25PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.