Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: K-27 minimum radius (dumb question)

August 14, 2006 01:34AM
Thanks for the praise. My entire book is targeted for for the live steam hobbyist who does not really know what to look for and when to be concerned about different items in civil engineering. Much of it can be useful for most any gauge. I have donated a copy to the Friends for our library.
I laughed at a local museum that argued for 2-3 weeks over using the RR definition (chord) or the highway definition (arc) of degree of curvature (DOC). They were designing with radii in the 800 foot range. The two definitions to the DOC are identical to two decimal places down to about a 600 foot radius (0.01' = about 1/8th of an inch).
My oh my.
Doug vV
Subject Author Posted

K-27 minimum radius

Douglas vV August 13, 2006 03:04AM

Re: K-27 minimum radius

Marty Knox August 13, 2006 07:11AM

Re: K-27 minimum radius

Douglas vV August 13, 2006 09:09AM

Re: K-27 minimum radius (dumb question)

Casey Akin August 13, 2006 05:55PM

Re: K-27 minimum radius (dumb question) *LINK*

Douglas vV August 13, 2006 06:23PM

Re: K-27 minimum radius (dumb question)

Brian Norden August 14, 2006 12:00AM

Re: K-27 minimum radius (dumb question)

Douglas vV August 14, 2006 01:34AM

Re: K-27 minimum radius (dumb question)

Brian Norden August 14, 2006 01:53AM

Re: K-27 minimum radius (dumb question)

Douglas vV August 14, 2006 03:42AM

Re: K-27 minimum radius (dumb question)

Douglas vV August 14, 2006 03:44AM

Re: K-27 minimum radius (dumb question)

Tom Farmer August 13, 2006 06:28PM

Re: K-27 minimum radius (dumb question)

Bill Pratt August 13, 2006 09:38PM

Re: K-27 minimum radius (dumb question)

Casey Akin aka: kitBASHer August 13, 2006 11:02PM

Re: K-27 minimum radius (dumb question)

RGSW August 14, 2006 03:35PM

Re: K-27 minimum radius (dumb question) *LINK*

Bill Pratt August 14, 2006 10:01PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.