Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: RGS Train Order #2

July 14, 2006 04:39PM
You got it, George, with the little extra of having rights over the scheduled freight, No. 11, between Mancos and Glencoe. The ruling grade from Dolores, MP 103, to Millwood Summit, MP 115, was 2.5% but it wasn't really encountered until you got to Glencoe, MP 111. The one C-16 could handle the mixed to Glencoe but would need a helper from there to Millwood.
Both sides of Cima Summit were pretty consistent 2.5% so they would need to doublehead all the way from Mancos, MP 122, to Cima, MP 142.
This order not only gives great insight to the operations but it neatly reflects the use of leased D&RG power at the time as well. The RGS would have had 13 engines in 1921 (C-16-60's 3, 6, 10, 12, 15, 16 and 17; T-19-85's 20, 22 and 25; C-19-70's 40 and 41; C-17-70 42). With two scheduled passenger trains, two scheduled mixed trains and four scheduled freights, there would certainly be need for some outside help!
Subject Author Posted

RGS Train Order #2

John Templeton Chama Station Agent July 12, 2006 07:55AM

Re: RGS Train Order #2

rg479 July 12, 2006 09:43AM

Re: RGS Train Order #2

John Templeton Chama Station Agent July 12, 2006 09:59AM

Check with Jerry Day

Bill M. July 12, 2006 10:01AM

Re: RGS Train Order #2

Jerry Day July 12, 2006 02:48PM

Re: RGS Train Order #2

William Reed July 12, 2006 04:38PM

Re: RGS Train Order #2

rg479 July 12, 2006 06:08PM

Re: RGS Train Order #2

Jerry Day July 13, 2006 06:46AM

Jerry, what's the distance...

Herb Kelsey July 14, 2006 04:29PM

Re: Jerry, what's the distance...

Keith Hayes July 16, 2006 08:57AM

Re: RGS Train Order #2

George Pearce July 12, 2006 11:21AM

Re: RGS Train Order #2

Herb Kelsey July 14, 2006 04:39PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.