Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Location isn't the issue

April 27, 2006 10:52PM
No question that a common physical location can improve communication and decision making. But right now the problem is far more basic than that. The current "triad" of Commission, Friends, and Operator is missing a key element....a stable operator.
In the old days the triad worked because for whatever reason Kyle was able to do an effective and more or less self-supporting job as operator. Now, for whatever reason, the operator has become an economic basket case, totally dependent on the funds provided by the states and to a lesser extent the Friends. I would suggest the triad has outlived its usefullness.
The states and the Friends need to come up with a whole new approach, so that the railroad has a cohesive governance structure reflecting it's various constituencies, reasonably stable and adequate source of funding, and an effective operating manangement.
Without suggesting the specifics of how this ought to be done, here are a couple of comments.
One, the Friends and perhaps the CRM need to step up aggresively to ensure the museum mission of the C&TS gets preserved. I am really concerned that if it is left up to the politicians in Denver and Santa Fe, they would be very happy to see a butts-on-seats tourist operation that pays very superficial if any attention to real historic interpretation. Which simpfly reflects the priorities of the local communities which are more interested in economics than history. The fact that the railroad has preserved as much authenticity as it has is probably more the result of the people at Kyle than anything inherent in the structure.
Two, the Friends need to get serious about major private fund raising to support the museum mission. Funding from the states is inherently political and therefore unpredictable. The volatility and uncertainly of state funding needs to be dampened by private sector fund raising. When I was on the Friends development committee we were told by every knowlegeable person we talked with that we were a fund raising opportunity looking for a place to happen. But the powers that be chose to focus inward and raise far more modest sums from the membership primarily.
Three, whatever organization that evolves needs to expand it's base. There are some significant organizations that could contribute, but have been largely excluded. The C&TS as a railroad museum is of national significance, not just local. The CRM comes to mind as does the Narrow Gauge Foundation, and there are probably others. The railroad needs a larger gene pool from which to draw its leadership.
For what it's worth.
JBW
Subject Author Posted

All Triad organizations lead to Chama

Rod Jensen April 26, 2006 11:32PM

Re: All Triad organizations lead to Chama

Herb Kelsey April 27, 2006 12:07PM

Re: Triad head quarters

Don Richter April 27, 2006 12:10PM

Jay's post *NM* *LINK*

Don Richter April 27, 2006 12:16PM

Re: Jay's post -correct link *LINK*

LinkMeister April 27, 2006 01:01PM

My apologies

Don Richter April 27, 2006 02:13PM

Re: My apologies

Fled bork April 28, 2006 09:44AM

Re: My apologies

Steve Stockham April 28, 2006 02:24PM

Amen, Grow Up *NM*

Josh McNeal April 28, 2006 02:52PM

Re: Amen, Grow Up

Steve Singer April 28, 2006 04:45PM

Location isn't the issue

John West April 27, 2006 10:52PM

Re: Location isn't the issue

Steve Stockham April 28, 2006 05:36AM

Responding to my own post!

John West April 29, 2006 01:36PM

Re: Responding to my own post!

Burr Hubbell April 29, 2006 02:15PM

Kyle

John West April 29, 2006 04:08PM

Re: Kyle *PIC*

John West April 29, 2006 04:23PM

Re: Kyle

John Bush May 01, 2006 11:08AM

Re: Responding to my own post!

PRSL April 30, 2006 06:12AM

Re: Responding to my own post!

Burr Hubbell April 30, 2006 06:52AM

PRSL and tie lengths

Mark Valerius May 02, 2006 12:04PM

Re: PRSL and tie lengths

Jerry Day May 02, 2006 01:06PM

Re: Responding to your post!

PRSL May 02, 2006 07:37PM

Re: Responding to your post!

Fred May 03, 2006 09:58AM

Re:Tie length!

PRSL May 03, 2006 05:14PM

Re:Tie length!

Fred May 03, 2006 06:24PM

Re:Tie length!

Rick Steele May 04, 2006 08:40AM

Re:Tie length!

Fred May 04, 2006 09:07AM

Re:Tie length! *LINK*

rick b May 04, 2006 10:43AM

Re:C&S Tie length

Rick Steele May 06, 2006 12:39PM

Re:C&S Tie length (treated size?)

Clyde May 06, 2006 04:07PM

Re:C&S Tie length (treated size?)

Rick Steele May 07, 2006 07:28AM

treated wood

rick b May 04, 2006 01:53AM

Re: treated wood *NM* *LINK*

Festus May 04, 2006 08:21AM

Re: treated wood

rick b May 04, 2006 10:40AM

Thinking outside the box(es)

Rod Jensen May 01, 2006 12:28AM

Re: All Triad organizations lead to Chama

Steve Singer April 28, 2006 06:18AM

Re: All Triad organizations lead to Chama

Burr Hubbell April 28, 2006 07:22AM

Re: All Triad organizations lead to Chama

Rod Jensen April 28, 2006 12:03PM

Re: Appology?

Chris Callaway April 28, 2006 12:48PM

Re: All Triad organizations vs the Moon

John Frank April 28, 2006 07:39PM

Re: All Triad organizations vs the Moon

Carl April 28, 2006 07:57PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.