Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: No.9 on the Loop

Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View
Steven Torrico
March 26, 2006 04:04PM
Mike: As I stated, Railstar and its employees are only the "custodians" of equipment provided to the operation by CHS. I personally am not aware of the incorrect lettering. I am sure it is something we can address once the locomotive is up and running....which I am sure you would agree is the priority right now. I am not an expert in the Colorado railroading history, I am new to Colorado and am eager to learn all that I can, which I would imagine will take many, many years of study. I am certain that there will be many disagreements as to the final "look" of the engine. It is my understanding the the "look" CHS choose was as it looked in its last days of operation, as opposed to the many earlier incarnations....I would hope that everyone will just be happy that the engine is returned to service.
Reply Quote
Message List Previous Message Next Message
RSS
Subject Author Posted

No.9 on the Loop

Steven Torrico March 25, 2006 04:10PM

Re: No.9 on the Loop

Steve Stockham March 25, 2006 08:45PM

Re: No.9 on the Loop *PIC*

Shane Schabow March 26, 2006 02:26AM

Re: No.9 on the Loop

Steven Torrico March 26, 2006 06:59AM

Re: No.9 on the Loop

Michael Allen March 26, 2006 08:07AM

Re: No.9 on the Loop

Steven Torrico March 26, 2006 04:04PM

Re: No.9 on the Loop

Terry Van Schwartz March 27, 2006 07:38PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.