Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Tunnel message found

Earl Knoob
December 20, 2000 07:39AM
I don't know where Bob got this info, as it is new to me. In the years I worked there, the track was never raised in Rock Tunnel. OY was hauled through Rock Tunnel from Antonito in the fall of 1977 for use in the 1978 rotary run.
Rock Tunnel is a BIG hole. The DRG enlarged it sometime in the distant past (photos prove this).
It clears a locomotive by at least 5 feet vertically. I have sat on the cupola of 0503 going through the tunnel and could not touch the roof (don't try this at home kiddies). A man on the roof of a boxcar will easily clear. The track would have to have been lifted about 4 feet to cause a clearance problem.
Which brings to mind a question I have never been able to answer. There are tell tales of (relatively) modern construction on each end of Rock Tunnel. OK, no big deal, lots of roads did this. But 3 miles east at Mud Tunnel where the clearance is MUCH tighter and a man on the roof would be surely taken out, there are none. Further more, there is very little reason for someone to be on the roof at Rock Tunnel, whereas Mud Tunnel is only 1/4 mi west of Toltec siding. In the days before "the devil's invention" (radio), a crewman had to be on the roof to signal the headend when pulling out. With the curves, there was no way to see the rear from the front end. To aid the engineer there is a marker on the west end of the tunnel with the number "60" to tell the engineer how many cars are past the west switch. It seems a telltale at Mud Tunnel would have been a necessity.
Concerning the width of DRGW NG equipment. All the outside frame locomotives are wider than their standard guage counterparts. Dispite what you might think, a 490 is not the widest engine, 470's are the widest by nearly 6". 470's also have the longest wheelbase (pony truck to trailer truck).
Subject Author Posted

Any status on Diesel 19?

Tom Stewart December 12, 2000 12:51PM

No. 19

John electrician West December 13, 2000 05:33PM

Re: No. 19

Brian Norden December 13, 2000 07:52PM

Bad news re 19

John West December 14, 2000 04:27PM

Re: Bad news re 19

jay December 14, 2000 07:09PM

Antonito Steam

John bad news West December 14, 2000 08:38PM

Re: Antonito Steam

jay December 15, 2000 08:28AM

Rotary Propulsion

James R. Temple December 15, 2000 06:53PM

Re: Rotary Propulsion

jay December 15, 2000 07:15PM

Re: Rotary Propulsion

tim olson December 17, 2000 08:13PM

Re: Rotary Propulsion

jay December 17, 2000 08:31PM

Re: Rotary Propulsion

Earl Knoob December 18, 2000 07:07AM

Re: Rotary Propulsion

Duane Richardson December 18, 2000 08:51AM

Re: Rotary Propulsion

Earl Knoob December 18, 2000 11:22AM

Re: Tunnel message found

Duane Richardson December 19, 2000 01:51PM

Re: Tunnel message found

Earl Knoob December 20, 2000 07:39AM

Re: Tunnel message found

Duane Richardson December 21, 2000 01:26PM

Re: Bad news re 19

Tom Stewart December 15, 2000 08:55AM

Re: Bad news re 19

Jim Burrill December 15, 2000 09:28AM

Re: For what my opinion is worth.

Jim Burrill December 15, 2000 07:20PM

Re: Bad news re 19

Boris Serena December 15, 2000 10:28AM

Re: Bad news re 19

Fred T December 15, 2000 11:40AM

Re: Bad news re 19

Josh Levine December 15, 2000 05:13PM

Solution?

zephyrus December 15, 2000 06:47PM

Re: Solution?

Oil Czar(Jerry Huck SVRy) December 15, 2000 09:35PM

Re: Solution?

J. B. Bane December 16, 2000 12:20PM

Re: Bad news re 19

Shane Schabow December 17, 2000 04:44PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.