Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Not a Ruling

December 21, 2005 04:29PM
I think we're in basic agreement, with perhaps a minor difference or two. What's interesting to me, as I think about this, is that the opinion was requested by the Commission. To that I would say, "thank you" and add a "what took you so long?!".
It's a small step and at this point doesn't change much yet, but it is a step, and one I'm pleased to see the Commission taking.
Scott
Subject Author Posted

Ruled: C&TS never affected by TABOR *LINK*

The Linkman December 21, 2005 11:36AM

Re: Not a Ruling

Scott Turner December 21, 2005 01:40PM

Re: Not a Ruling

Burr Hubbell December 21, 2005 02:14PM

Re: Not a Ruling

Scott Turner December 21, 2005 04:29PM

Re: Not a Ruling

Bill Pratt December 21, 2005 08:48PM

Re: Not a Ruling

John Cole December 21, 2005 09:32PM

Re: Not a Ruling

John Templeton Chama Station Agent December 22, 2005 07:31AM

Quit that....

Dave Bates December 22, 2005 07:40AM

Re: Quit that....

John Templeton Chama Station Agent December 22, 2005 07:48AM

Re: Not a Ruling

Burr Hubbell December 22, 2005 09:34AM

Re: Not a Ruling

John Templeton Chama Station Agent December 22, 2005 09:45AM

Re: Not a Ruling

Burr Hubbell December 22, 2005 10:32AM

Re: Not a Ruling

Bill Pratt December 22, 2005 04:07PM

Re: Not a Ruling

Scott Turner December 22, 2005 10:01AM

Re: One more thing

Scott Turner December 22, 2005 10:14AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.