Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Return to service of DRGW#318 and RGS Goose#7

Matthew
April 01, 2005 10:47AM
That is great that they are making cost-reducing efforts to restore the 318, but it unnatural to have the 318 propelled in this manner. However I am happy that they are returning it to service.
As for the matter of Goose 7, I believe it should keep its original pierce body because that is the way it has always been. It will be a comparison for future generations to see the original goose bodies compared to the upgraded geese (3, 4, & 5). Also, I believe that it should be preserved in the manner how it wa when the RGS owned her. On the other hand though, I am glad the 7 is being maintained and still exists today.
Subject Author Posted

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Paul Luning March 31, 2005 10:52PM

Re: Return to service of DRGW#318 and RGS Goose#7

Paul Hagglund March 31, 2005 10:57PM

Other restorations in Colorado

Dick Grosbier April 01, 2005 07:57AM

Re: Return to service of DRGW#318 and RGS Goose#7

Matthew April 01, 2005 10:47AM

Re: Return to service of DRGW#318 and RGS Goose#7

Paul Gibbs April 01, 2005 01:45PM

Re: Return to service of DRGW#318 and RGS Goose#7

Fred April 01, 2005 07:57PM

Pedal powered 315

Paul Luning April 02, 2005 08:14AM

Re: Return to service of DRGW#318 and RGS Goose#7

Matthew April 01, 2005 08:38PM

Re: Return of DRGW#318 , RGS #7 and 483 ...

Russ Sperry April 01, 2005 10:55PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.