Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Third rail at the Gorge versus FRA

PRSL
October 25, 2004 07:47AM
A third rail could be added in the Gorge with the arrival on one welded rail train containing the worn rail from a main line replacement at scrap or slightly higher price. Rail height should not be of concern as you are only talking the difference from 4" to 7.125".
Your bigger concern should be the fact that you are now into then national system where all the FRA rules now apply, including all the old ICC rules for interchange equipment. All the reporting and inspection requirements and record keeping as all interchange railroad now comply.
Unless, you establish a separate lease of the property to segregate it into a isolated right of way (private railroad) by a time period and rail removal. You can have a private isolated operation over the same R/W as a common-carrier railroad, but it has to have positive limits to prevent any overlapping operation.
Example: San Diego trolley over freight like to Mexican border. New Jersey Transit "River LINE" Trenton to Camden over Conrail freight line that is served at night. West Virginia Central from High Falls to Bergoo, WV (longest private RR in US) which is isolated by a derail for the "Salamander" to operate alone on it, removed from FRA.
Those wooden GLInc passenger cars do not meet the compression test for passenger equipment on national lines.
Subject Author Posted

GLR Equipment Moves

Phil Reader October 21, 2004 08:56PM

Re: GLR Equipment Moves

WP&Ymike October 23, 2004 01:15AM

Re: GLR Equipment Moves

Phil Reader October 23, 2004 07:32AM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Alan October 24, 2004 01:34AM

Third rail at the Gorge

Dave S. October 24, 2004 10:00AM

Re: Third rail at the Gorge versus FRA

PRSL October 25, 2004 07:47AM

Re: Third rail at the Gorge versus FRA

South Park October 25, 2004 09:26PM

FRA and other stuff

Jim Templin October 26, 2004 07:37AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.