Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: CRRM DRG/W map cache

March 29, 2024 06:38PM avatar
16-bit TIFF is good for archival, retains the most of the resolution/tonality of the scanner. If your software has TIFF compression, it retains the same image quality.

JPEG is lossy in any setting because it combines information to do the encoding, but retains information okay even under significant compression. I wouldn't use it for archiving. I had to iterate through the JPEG quality settings until the image was smaller than the 2.44MB limit imposed by NGDF, so a bit of a PITA. There's software that will pre-compute the file size before saving, but that can add to the processing time because the image has to be JPEG-encoded internally to determine the final size.

Okay, back to narrow-gauging...
Subject Author Posted

CRRM DRG/W map cache

Elrey March 28, 2024 09:35AM

Re: CRRM DRG/W map cache

Everett Lueck March 29, 2024 08:53AM

Re: CRRM DRG/W map cache

Elrey March 29, 2024 01:39PM

Re: CRRM DRG/W map cache

Elrey March 29, 2024 03:26PM

Re: CRRM DRG/W map cache

Glenn Butcher March 29, 2024 04:19PM

Re: CRRM DRG/W map cache

Elrey March 29, 2024 04:28PM

Re: CRRM DRG/W map cache Attachments

Glenn Butcher March 29, 2024 04:42PM

Re: CRRM DRG/W map cache

Elrey March 29, 2024 05:58PM

Re: CRRM DRG/W map cache

Glenn Butcher March 29, 2024 06:38PM

Re: CRRM DRG/W map cache

Dorman Collection March 29, 2024 06:41PM

Re: CRRM DRG/W map cache

Rader Sidetrack March 29, 2024 04:46PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login