Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Lobato Bridge Reconstruction Report

December 10, 2021 09:00AM avatar
I skimmed the history part and read the trades part. I think this is a rather important account to keep, documenting both the 'was' and the 'is' of the bridge as it transitioned from it's original configuration to what it is post-repair.

The section, "Bridge Analysis and Rating" is interesting, particularly this statement: " Results of the rating analysis deter-mined that the bridge in its pre-fire condition was overstressed from 20 to 30 percent when loaded by the current trains at the bridge spans and at two of the tallest bridge bents." If you read a bit before this they describe the load conditions, two trains a day, max speed of 8mph, pulled by a K-27 or K-28. Supports the "no double-heading" restriction. What's not said in the report is how the new design affects the overstress condition of the old design...
Subject Author Posted

Lobato Bridge Reconstruction Report Attachments

Rader Sidetrack December 09, 2021 07:04PM

Re: Lobato Bridge Reconstruction Report

GeorgeGaskill December 09, 2021 07:42PM

Re: Lobato Bridge Reconstruction Report

davidtltc December 10, 2021 06:46AM

Re: Lobato Bridge Reconstruction Report

Glenn Butcher December 10, 2021 09:00AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login