Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: San Juan Extension and profitability

December 08, 2021 09:51AM
I remember Bob Richardson telling me this as well as reading somewhere that the Rio Grande tried to turn down El Paso Natural Gas Co on the pipe haul into Farmington because they concluded that with the trans-shipment of pipe in Alamosa and the necessity to rehabilitate much of the track, plus the necessity of rehabbing and converting cars for the pipe traffic, that there was no possibility of making a profit. I believe that El Paso turned to the ICC and got a ruling forcing the Rio Grande to take the traffic because there was simply no way of hauling that volume of pipe into Farmington by truck, given both the trucks and the roads of the 1950s in that area.

Whether they ever made a profit or not, I do not know, only that they thought that they would not and could not.

I hope that someone out there can go into this in more detail.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/08/2021 09:52AM by Everett Lueck.
Subject Author Posted

San Juan Extension and profitability

kcsivils December 07, 2021 04:36PM

Re: San Juan Extension and profitability

GeorgeGaskill December 07, 2021 10:32PM

Re: San Juan Extension and profitability

John West December 07, 2021 11:25PM

Re: San Juan Extension and profitability

Mark Petersen December 08, 2021 10:04AM

Re: San Juan Extension and profitability

John West December 08, 2021 10:47AM

Norwood's book discusses this topic

Brian Shoup December 08, 2021 11:40AM

Re: San Juan Extension and profitability

Sharrod December 08, 2021 05:01AM

Re: San Juan Extension and profitability

MD Ramsey December 08, 2021 08:41AM

Re: San Juan Extension and profitability

Everett Lueck December 08, 2021 09:51AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login