Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Modelling ET&WNC after 1950 question.

November 10, 2020 03:40PM avatar
The only problem there is that the line went from Johnson City as far as Cranberry, a mining town which wasn't exactly doing all that well by then. There were communities along the way but they got what they needed by LcL and truck long before then.
I doubt container operations would have done much for them as there wasn't anywhere between those two points to serve.
I think the only way it would have continued would be if something truly valuable got found up in those mountains neat Cranberry (or maybe, just maybe, north of there where a portion of the line torn up after 1940 could have been rebuilt) as there weren't many excellent roads between those points at that time.

nickgully Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think they might have expanded their intermodal operations, and grown like the Rio Grande Silverton branch in more tourist focused amenities, like an old west town.
>
> -Nick

-Lee

Flickr photo set of my On30 layout
Subject Author Posted

Modelling ET&WNC after 1950 question.

I_love_D&RG November 08, 2020 09:10AM

Re: Modelling ET&WNC after 1950 question.

et&wnc November 08, 2020 10:38AM

Re: Modelling ET&WNC after 1950 question.

nickgully November 09, 2020 06:48PM

Re: Modelling ET&WNC after 1950 question.

et&wnc November 10, 2020 03:40PM

Re: Modelling ET&WNC after 1950 question.

Andrew Roth November 10, 2020 09:07PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login