Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Georgetown Loop / Denver Post *LINK*

March 12, 2004 09:59AM
Struggle to keep steam alive seems universal.
CHS seems to believe they have a better idea of how to operate a mountain railroad than the people that have been doing it successfully since 1973. CHS has changed people countless times since 1973, while the Loop operators have persistently remained.
I have worked there since 1996 and attest that Georgetown Loop operators are some of the best people I have ever met and worked for. Hopefully things work out. I'm hoping CHS gets some input from people that understand railroading before CHS makes a complete mess of this. I don't have CHS contact info - perhaps somebody here does?
V see V
[www.denverpost.com]%257E53%257E2012012,00.html
Subject Author Posted

Georgetown Loop / Denver Post *LINK*

Steve Peck March 12, 2004 09:59AM

Not good news

roger hogan March 12, 2004 10:18AM

Re: Not good news *LINK*

Steve Peck March 12, 2004 11:32AM

Re: Jeez...........

Gavin Hamilton March 12, 2004 12:22PM

Equipment

Sam March March 12, 2004 12:53PM

69?

Ken Martin March 12, 2004 06:33PM

Re: 69? *PIC*

Sam March March 12, 2004 06:57PM

Re: 69? *PIC*

Dave Dye March 12, 2004 08:42PM

Insurance Again.

Mike Trent March 12, 2004 03:33PM

Re: Georgetown Loop / Denver Post

Rick Steele March 12, 2004 07:32PM

Re: Georgetown Loop / Denver Post

Jim March 12, 2004 10:09PM

Re: Georgetown Loop / Denver Post

John Craft March 13, 2004 06:09AM

Re: Georgetown Loop / Denver Post

Shane Schabow March 13, 2004 12:15PM

Re: Georgetown Loop / Denver Post

Douglas vV March 13, 2004 12:19PM

Re: Georgetown Loop / Denver Post

Ken March 13, 2004 12:47PM

Re: Georgetown Loop / Denver Post

Skip Luke March 13, 2004 07:00PM

Re: Georgetown Loop / Denver Post

Fritz Klinke March 14, 2004 01:39AM

Re: Georgetown Loop / Denver Post

Jerry Day March 13, 2004 12:52PM

CHS response.

Douglas vV March 16, 2004 11:57AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.