July 11, 2019 06:33PM
I'm thinking 168 marooned on a passenger train somewhere and 315 and 463 pushing a rotary (likely with at least another K27 or C class) would be halfway believable. But in that case OM would be a more fitting rotary. Isn't OY a '23 model? If so, its unlikely a C class would have been used in rotary duty at that point, as the K28s showed up in '23 and and K36 in '25.
Subject Author Posted

168, 315, 463, OY

davidtltc July 11, 2019 08:13AM

Re: 168, 315, 463, OY

guymonmd July 11, 2019 08:34AM

Re: 168, 315, 463, OY

Bill Scobie July 11, 2019 09:00AM

Re: 168, 315, 463, OY

Greg Scholl July 11, 2019 10:53AM

Re: 168, 315, 463, OY

davidtltc July 11, 2019 11:13AM

Re: 168, 315, 463, OY

Volvoguy87 July 11, 2019 11:27AM

Re: 168, 315, 463, OY

guymonmd July 11, 2019 11:44AM

Re: 168, 315, 463, OY

Bill M. July 11, 2019 12:31PM

Re: 168, 315, 463, OY

Volvoguy87 July 12, 2019 07:43AM

Re: 168, 315, 463, OY

John K July 11, 2019 06:33PM

419 with a rotary clearing the line in Ibex Branch Attachments

davidtltc July 12, 2019 04:28PM

looks like a T-12, but is it standard gauge? Attachments

davidtltc July 12, 2019 04:47PM

Re: looks like a T-12, but is it standard gauge? Attachments

Chris Walker July 12, 2019 05:02PM

Re: looks like a T-12, but is it standard gauge?

guymonmd July 12, 2019 05:32PM

Re: looks like a T-12, but is it standard gauge?

Bill M. July 12, 2019 06:09PM

Re: looks like a T-12, but is it standard gauge?

guymonmd July 12, 2019 06:12PM

Ibex branch

hank July 13, 2019 03:20PM

Re: Ibex branch

guymonmd July 13, 2019 06:16PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login