Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 42, Cascade turns, & the railcar

March 21, 2019 01:34PM avatar
hank Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tom Dittmer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Surely the very skillful and talented staff at
> the
> > Durango Roundhouse have inspected and evaluated
> > the current status of the 42 and have some
> > estimate of what it would take to bring it back
> > into service, and/or completely restore her.
> I'm
> > very curious what they think. A couple years ago
> I
> > remember something about the shop folks
> inspecting
> > everything. I think that contributed to the
> quick
> > restoration of the 476 and now the 493. I think
> > (out side of the 480's ) the 478 may be next.
> I'd
> > bet there is a plan for the railbus and the
> 498.
> > … just curios about the 42. Those guys can
> work
> > miracles.
>
> Last I heard, at 3rd hand from a post here several
> years ago, #42's frame had been broken and welded
> back together roughly that it was beyond farther
> repair and would have to be entirely replaced. I
> also seem to recall that she still has her
> original (1887) lap-seam boiler and that is in
> very poor condition. In short, the only piece in
> really good condition is the cylinder saddle
> (replaced ca 1927) and that other than that it
> would be a case of "Jack up the bell & the cab and
> roll a new engine under them." She was used
> mighty hard for a long time, let her rest.
> hank

The RGS pretty much gave on the 42 in the late 1940's relegating her to "snowplow service" out of Durango. And, even at that she never seemed to go anywhere, with the RGS preferring to rent 464 if they needed to go anywhere when it was snowing.

To get an idea of what 42 would need, just look at the massive undertaking the RGS 20 has become. And......#20 was the RGS' pet, she was in "good" shape.

I have seen documentation that #42 did get a new boiler somewhere in time. She would have been the only C-17 to get such an upgrade. The one of the reasons rest of the class was retired was they still had their original 1887 lap-seam boilers. The Rio Grande in their incredible cheapness didn't reboiler the C-17 because they were built with steel boilers, and therefore could get past the 1911 boiler inspection law running at 145 lbs. The rest of the 2-8-0 fleet were built with iron boilers, which could not meet the new regs, so they had to reboiler them in order to keep running. The new boilers were rated at 160 lbs, which gave them a bit more power, but made them a bit more slippery too.
Subject Author Posted

You and $69.00 Attachments

rehunn March 12, 2019 03:49PM

Re: You and $69.00

michael March 12, 2019 08:11PM

Re: You and $69.00

Maury Ballstein March 12, 2019 08:29PM

Re: You and $69.00

Greg Scholl March 12, 2019 09:09PM

Re: You and $69.00

cdaspit March 12, 2019 09:15PM

Re: You and $69.00

rehunn March 12, 2019 09:17PM

Re: You and $69.00

James Parfrey March 12, 2019 10:04PM

Re: You and $69.00

Brian Norden March 12, 2019 11:51PM

Re: You and $69.00

Greg Scholl March 13, 2019 07:54AM

Re: You and $69.00

Tom Dittmer March 13, 2019 09:07AM

Re: You and $69.00

Carl T. Henderson March 13, 2019 12:04PM

Re: You and $69.00

Maury Ballstein March 13, 2019 07:36PM

Re: You and $69.00

pd3463 March 13, 2019 07:55PM

Re: You and $69.00

Maury Ballstein March 13, 2019 09:17PM

Re: You and $69.00

Carl T. Henderson March 13, 2019 09:31PM

42, Cascade turns, & the railcar

hank March 14, 2019 07:41AM

Re: 42, Cascade turns, & the railcar

bnsf dispr March 17, 2019 06:28PM

Re: 42, Cascade turns, & the railcar

Carl T. Henderson March 17, 2019 07:41PM

Re: 42, Cascade turns, & the railcar

GeorgeGaskill March 20, 2019 01:01AM

Re: 42, Cascade turns, & the railcar

Tom Dittmer March 20, 2019 09:26AM

Re: 42, Cascade turns, & the railcar

hank March 21, 2019 07:10AM

Re: 42, Cascade turns, & the railcar

Earl March 21, 2019 01:34PM

Re: 42, Cascade turns, & the railcar

Olaf Rasmussen March 21, 2019 05:15PM

Re: 42, Cascade turns, & the railcar

Maury Ballstein March 21, 2019 05:48PM

Railbus

pd3463 March 13, 2019 07:37PM

Re: You and $69.00

AZ Railfan March 13, 2019 11:55AM

Re: You and $69.00

jim pallow March 13, 2019 12:30PM

Re: You and $69.00

rehunn March 13, 2019 12:39PM

Re: You and $69.00

guymonmd March 13, 2019 12:44PM

Re: You and $69.00

Maury Ballstein March 13, 2019 09:28PM

Re: You and $69.00

Maury Ballstein March 13, 2019 09:46PM

Re: You and $69.00

Como March 13, 2019 05:05PM

Re: You and $69.00

michael March 13, 2019 09:14PM

Re: You and $69.00

Maury Ballstein March 13, 2019 09:23PM

Re: You and $69.00

rehunn March 13, 2019 10:03PM

Re: You and $69.00

Como March 14, 2019 11:46AM

Re: You and $69.00

Sharrod March 14, 2019 03:13PM

Re: You and $69.00

Glenn Butcher March 14, 2019 03:28PM

Re: You and $69.00

Sharrod March 14, 2019 06:03PM

Re: You and $69.00

Brian Norden March 14, 2019 06:26PM

Re: You and $69.00

Earl March 14, 2019 07:29PM

Re: You and $69.00

Chris Walker March 14, 2019 06:41PM

Re: You and $69.00

Greg Scholl March 14, 2019 07:38PM

Re: You and $69.00

Como March 15, 2019 09:03AM

Re: You and $69.00

rehunn March 15, 2019 12:16PM

Re: You and $69.00

Sharrod March 15, 2019 04:09PM

Re: You and $69.00

Tom Dittmer March 15, 2019 06:59PM

Re: You and $69.00

durangokid123 March 16, 2019 04:54PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login