Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

November 09, 2018 03:49PM
The most recent photo I've found of #474 is here, taken October 16, 1941. That's a full year before she was shipped off to Alaska, but you can see she doesn't have plow mounts FWIW.

I read somewhere (a Bob Richardson book perhaps?) that they didn't put a plow on her because they had that crazy gondola in Gunnison with the jumbo plow mounted on it, and of course #474 was based out of Gunnison.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 11/09/2018 03:54PM by DakotaRed.
Subject Author Posted

Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives? Attachments

DakotaRed November 08, 2018 07:16PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

drgwk37 November 08, 2018 08:05PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

DakotaRed November 09, 2018 03:58PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

drgwk37 November 09, 2018 06:41PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

Kelly Anderson November 08, 2018 08:14PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

TonyK375 November 08, 2018 10:09PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

TonyK375 November 08, 2018 10:27PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

daveyb November 09, 2018 01:13PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

daveyb November 09, 2018 01:13PM

Flanger illustrations Attachments

DakotaRed November 09, 2018 03:39PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

DakotaRed November 09, 2018 03:49PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login