Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: “Caboose” 04892

October 03, 2018 10:54AM avatar
The SP at one time had a former short RPO that was used as a caboose by a local crew on the Colma branch if I remember correctly. I suspect it was listed in SP's records as a caboose, because it was used as a caboose. It would not surprise me that the ICC might have had some kind of regulation requiring that. A lot of the record keeping in those days was done pursuant to ICC reporting requirements. That might explain how 04892 got designated as a caboose, but presumably it should have been changed when it went on the wreck train in some other service.

JBWX
Subject Author Posted

“Caboose” 04892

DakotaRed September 30, 2018 08:46AM

Re: “Caboose” 04892

Bill M. September 30, 2018 09:05AM

Re: “Caboose” 04892

george pearce September 30, 2018 09:45AM

Re: “Caboose” 04892

DakotaRed October 03, 2018 09:53AM

Re: “Caboose” 04892

John West October 03, 2018 10:54AM

Re: “Caboose” 04892

bcp October 03, 2018 11:48AM

Re: “Caboose” 04892

Earl October 03, 2018 12:46PM

Yosemite Valley?

John West October 03, 2018 01:46PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login