Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

August 17, 2018 09:49AM avatar
Casey Akin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Unfortunately, I think the largest problem for
> this trade is the fact that 483 was involved. If
> it were any other K-36 up for trade, there
> wouldn't be nearly as much resistance.
>
> One thing to think about counter to this point, I
> believe all other K-36's have run for the C&TS
> longer than the 483 did. This could be argued that
> it gives all other engines more reason to stay.
> Everyday we live goes down in history, not just
> the first and last. However, sometimes those are
> the days that seem to matter the most...
>
> I for one was excited about the trade. The chance
> to see 483 run once more (first for me anyway),
> and the chance to see a K-28 in Chama again. Who
> knows what the future will bring! As previously
> stated, we have an operational K-37, with a second
> on the way. All K class engines have a running
> example, and with 493, all K classes will have two
> running examples!!! Not to forget, two
> three C-19's a C-18, and a T-12 (soon). You get 42
> and 278 running, and all remaining D&RGW classes
> will be operational!!! (Okay, pipe dream I know,
> but I can wish)
>
> I know 42 was already converted to oil, maybe the
> D&S could revisit this possibility when 493 is
> done. Of course I understand the size difference,
> her limits, and also the costs. If it were
> marketed right, it could bring some revenue.....
> Maybe presidential trains, or special RGS trains,
> or other special trains that don't require 10
> cars. When is the last time an RGS freight was
> pulled by an actual (second hand) RGS engine!!!
>
> I've got my blind fold on...
> Ready, Aim, Fire!!!
>
> Casey

All this hand wringing and pontificating about 483 could have been taken care of in 1991 if the D&S had decided that 483 was a better candidate for overhaul than 482. They had choice of either locomotive. They chose 482 because the boiler had a decent rear tube sheet. 483 needed a new one. Part of the trade agreement was 483 would be stripped of any parts that were missing from 482. So, the missing parts from 483, which are unique to a K-36, no longer exist in Chama.
Subject Author Posted

D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

craig August 16, 2018 12:53PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

drgwk37 August 16, 2018 01:51PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they? Attachments

Jerry474 August 16, 2018 02:43PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

JoeK August 16, 2018 06:47PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Jerry474 August 16, 2018 08:57PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Rich Murray August 16, 2018 04:26PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Steve Forney August 16, 2018 10:17PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Rich Murray August 17, 2018 07:44AM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

KevinM August 16, 2018 03:03PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

SR_Krause August 17, 2018 06:57AM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

jim pallow August 16, 2018 03:13PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they? Attachments

Chris Walker August 16, 2018 03:28PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

cdaspit August 16, 2018 05:39PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Will Gant August 16, 2018 07:59PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

JoeK August 16, 2018 06:16PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

DWJ August 16, 2018 06:47PM

Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Bill M. August 16, 2018 08:58PM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Casey Akin August 16, 2018 10:02PM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Earl August 17, 2018 09:49AM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

JoeK August 17, 2018 10:17AM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Jerry474 August 17, 2018 11:43AM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Rich Murray August 17, 2018 12:19PM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Jerry474 August 17, 2018 12:31PM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Rich Murray August 17, 2018 12:54PM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Jerry474 August 17, 2018 01:56PM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Rich Murray August 17, 2018 02:05PM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Jerry474 August 17, 2018 02:21PM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Rich Murray August 17, 2018 02:43PM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Jerry474 August 17, 2018 03:41PM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Dick Cowles August 17, 2018 12:55PM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade? Attachments

Jerry474 August 17, 2018 01:41PM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Dick Cowles August 17, 2018 01:53PM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

SR_Krause August 17, 2018 07:01AM

Re: Does it make sense to revisit 483-478 trade?

Will Gant August 17, 2018 02:28PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

jim pallow August 17, 2018 06:31AM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Casey Akin August 17, 2018 05:56PM

Re: A K-27 or a K-28 is more than adequate as a Helper . . .thumbs upthumbs up

Russo Loco August 17, 2018 09:57PM

Re: A K-27 or a K-28 is more than adequate as a Helper . . .thumbs upthumbs up

Mike Stillwell August 18, 2018 05:50AM

Re: A K-27 or a K-28 is more than adequate as a Helper . . .thumbs upthumbs up

Casey Akin August 18, 2018 11:51AM

Re: A K-27 or a K-28 is more than adequate as a Helper . . .thumbs upthumbs up

JoeK August 18, 2018 03:06PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Earl August 17, 2018 10:36AM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Dick Cowles August 17, 2018 03:33PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Popeye8762 August 17, 2018 04:43PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

JoeK August 17, 2018 04:58PM

483 Air Compressor

Dick Cowles August 17, 2018 05:29PM

Re: 483 Air Compressor

Mike Stillwell August 17, 2018 06:17PM

Re: 483 Air Compressor

Dick Cowles August 17, 2018 06:36PM

Re: 483 Air Compressor

JoeK August 17, 2018 08:53PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

michael August 18, 2018 07:18PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Chris Walker August 19, 2018 01:21AM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Earl August 19, 2018 10:28AM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Kevin Cook August 19, 2018 02:15PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

michael August 19, 2018 07:37PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Rich Murray August 20, 2018 07:06AM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

TheTrekki August 20, 2018 07:27AM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

John Bush August 20, 2018 08:26AM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

tomc August 20, 2018 08:41AM

Mr. Bush, a question about the 497...

Ross Miller August 20, 2018 01:46PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

CharlieMcCandless August 20, 2018 03:50PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

TheTrekki August 21, 2018 10:50AM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

drgwk37 August 20, 2018 05:46PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Chris Walker August 21, 2018 01:50AM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

drgwk37 August 21, 2018 08:25AM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Will Gant August 21, 2018 02:06PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

drgwk37 August 21, 2018 05:16PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Chris Walker August 21, 2018 06:30PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Bill M. August 21, 2018 08:07PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Will Gant August 22, 2018 07:08PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Casey Akin August 23, 2018 12:15AM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Johnson Barr September 03, 2018 01:16AM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

michael August 20, 2018 06:34PM

Re: D&RGW 483/478 trade: no one really knows, do they?

Ross Miller August 20, 2018 07:33PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login