Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

January 03, 2018 07:55PM
Fares in the 1960s took a jolt when they were raised in 1967 from $6.00 to $6.50, children $4.25 to $4.50. Then again in 1971 another steep increase to $8.00 for adults and $5.00 for kids. So a family of 4 could ride the train for an amazing $26.00--one reason that there were long cancellation lines. The second train was augmented with the first bus service that the Grande initiated in 1969 that by the middle 70s had grown to 8 busses daily. These were operated at times under contract to the Grande by the Gray Line. Mike Darmour, who was the Durango School District's truant officer ran the bus service for the Grande for many years. These busses supplemented the capacity of the train without the necessity of adding additional rail equipment. Promoted as an alternative for those who wished to ride only one way, this device actually served to substantially increase ridership and for many was the only way they could ride the train. As explained in the Grande's sales prospectus for the Silverton branch, the Grande found itself in the tourist business in 1962 with no likely escape so decided to make the most of it--for only the Silverton line. The freight operations were never off the chopping block. Why run a train to Aztec (no wye or turning loop may factor into that) if it would add revenue to the freight line? Eliminate revenue, show no public need or necessity, and that's how they ultimately killed the rest of the narrow gauge.

Ridership figures varied wildly. In 1949 there were only 16 trains that carried 1882 passengers. In 1966 they operated 198 trains and carried 77,959 passengers and in 1971 operated 208 trains and carried 102,952 passengers. In the Bradshaw years, by the early 1990s, ridership was approaching 200,000, figures never achieved since. Sold out trains in the Grande years were the norm during late June through early August, the bus service and Bradshaw's added rail service eased that situation considerably. Even at the fares the Grande was charging, they made money. The flood expense was written off in 1970 and 1971 as extraordinary charges of $79,948 in 1971 and $66,817 in 1970, but still reported profits in both years. To put costs in perspective, the Grande estimated in 1972 that it would take 28 full (16 people year round) and part-time (summer) employees to operate the line at an estimated cost of $175,000.
Subject Author Posted

Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

kcsivils December 29, 2017 09:22PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

drgwk37 December 29, 2017 09:35PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

John Cole December 29, 2017 09:40PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

hank December 30, 2017 10:10AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

rdamurphy December 30, 2017 09:27PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Earl December 31, 2017 09:33AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

hank December 31, 2017 10:32AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

John West December 31, 2017 11:42AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

rdamurphy January 02, 2018 10:46AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Fritz Klinke December 31, 2017 02:49PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

drgwk37 December 31, 2017 03:31PM

Re: Rio Grande's hidden attitude at the end . . . thumbs upthumbs up

Russo Loco December 31, 2017 06:04PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

drgwk37 December 31, 2017 12:35PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Earl December 31, 2017 01:24PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

rehunn December 31, 2017 01:33PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end Attachments

MD Ramsey January 02, 2018 08:38AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Earl January 02, 2018 10:58AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end Attachments

MD Ramsey January 02, 2018 11:04AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Ross Miller January 02, 2018 12:32PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end Attachments

MD Ramsey January 02, 2018 01:03PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Earl January 02, 2018 12:35PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

drgwk37 January 02, 2018 11:30AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

MD Ramsey January 02, 2018 09:04AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

MikeL January 06, 2018 12:24PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Tomstp December 31, 2017 12:26PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

CVR220 December 31, 2017 08:02PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

hsuthe January 02, 2018 01:31PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Russo Loco January 02, 2018 05:53PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Tomstp January 02, 2018 06:50PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Fritz Klinke January 02, 2018 09:50PM

Re: Help Save The Narrow Gauge Railroad Attachments

davegrandt January 05, 2018 11:30AM

Management's motivation? Was there a source for the bias?

kcsivils January 05, 2018 11:54AM

Re: Management's motivation? Was there a source for the bias?

John West January 05, 2018 04:23PM

Re: Management's motivation? Was there a source for the bias?

Donald Foster January 05, 2018 07:05PM

Re: Management's motivation? Was there a source for the bias?

GeorgeGaskill January 05, 2018 11:21PM

Re: Management's motivation? Was there a source for the bias?

Russo Loco January 06, 2018 05:03PM

Re: Management's motivation? Was there a source for the bias?

hank January 06, 2018 09:38AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Les Jarrett January 02, 2018 11:28PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

hank January 03, 2018 10:20AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Tomstp January 03, 2018 10:57AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

CharlieMcCandless January 03, 2018 11:30AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Tomstp January 03, 2018 12:43PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

hank January 04, 2018 10:17AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Fritz Klinke January 03, 2018 07:55PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Andrew Roth January 04, 2018 06:58AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Fritz Klinke January 04, 2018 09:22AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end - fare comparrison Attachments

Andrew Roth January 07, 2018 04:48PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end - fare comparrison

Andy Walker January 07, 2018 06:08PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Steve Forney January 03, 2018 08:34PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Eddy Sand January 04, 2018 03:49PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

hsuthe January 05, 2018 09:37AM

But let's not forget

John West January 05, 2018 10:48AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Earl January 06, 2018 09:13AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

rehunn January 06, 2018 11:34AM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Russo Loco January 06, 2018 05:11PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

rehunn January 06, 2018 05:43PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Earl January 06, 2018 06:42PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

rehunn January 06, 2018 07:12PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Andrew Roth January 06, 2018 08:48PM

Re: Rio Grande's Attitude at the end

Brian Norden January 06, 2018 10:51PM

Standard gauge to Farmington

John West January 06, 2018 11:37PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login