Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Kodachrome 200

December 28, 2017 06:45PM avatar
I had acquired a 70-200 Nikkor which is a great lens, but it had no tripod socket (made for sports photography with Tri-X or some such), so I needed the extra speed for handheld tele shots. And the Kodachrome 200 looked okay when projected onto a beaded screen, which kinda covered up the grain. But when I started scanning the stuff years later....wow....just terrible. Compared with Kodachrome II that scans so well you almost think it is a digital original. Golly what great pix I cudda gotten in the 60's if I'd only had digital then......

JBWX
Subject Author Posted

That October 1997 charter Attachments

John West December 28, 2017 03:36PM

Re: That October 1997 charter

rehunn December 28, 2017 04:18PM

Re: That October 1997 charter

Curt Bianchi December 28, 2017 05:20PM

Re: That October 1997 charter

John West December 28, 2017 05:40PM

Re: That October 1997 charter

rehunn December 28, 2017 06:21PM

Kodachrome 200

John West December 28, 2017 06:45PM

Re: That October 1997 charter Attachments

Curt Bianchi December 28, 2017 06:36PM

Re: That October 1997 charter

John West December 28, 2017 06:52PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login