Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Porter 1203 TE

November 01, 2017 09:27PM
That 42K number certainly makes sense considering the locomotive weight and the fact that it's actually a C trucked unit, the drop at 9 mph also makes sense
considering the initial prime mover horsepower and the heat soak issues with the smaller traction motors. Now, someone needs to figure out what the Alco puts
out, at least 900 hp? and we can guess how far toward Rockwood the traction motors (and train) actually make.
Subject Author Posted

Porter 1203...

Taylor Rush June 18, 2007 10:33AM

Re: Porter 1203...

lanod June 18, 2007 12:59PM

Re: Porter 1203...

Taylor Rush June 18, 2007 02:32PM

Re: Porter 1203 TE

bcp June 18, 2007 02:50PM

Re: Porter 1203 TE

Brian Norden June 18, 2007 08:38PM

Re: Porter 1203 TE

Dan Robirds June 18, 2007 11:35PM

Re: Porter 1203 Weight

Skip June 19, 2007 03:40PM

Re: Porter 1203 Weight

Taylor Rush June 19, 2007 04:04PM

Re: Porter 1203 Weight

Skip June 19, 2007 04:25PM

Re: Porter 1203 Weight

El Skonk June 19, 2007 06:51PM

Re: Porter 1203 Weight

Dan Robirds June 19, 2007 09:48PM

Re: Loop Bridge capy.

Skip June 19, 2007 09:58PM

Re: Porter 1203 Weight

nickgully June 19, 2007 11:00PM

Re: Porter 1203 Weight

Skip June 20, 2007 02:18PM

Re: Porter 1203 TE

John Hewlett November 01, 2017 09:15PM

Re: Porter 1203 TE

rehunn November 01, 2017 09:27PM

Re: Porter 1203 TE

Will Gant November 01, 2017 10:48PM

Re: Porter 1203 TE

bcp November 01, 2017 11:04PM

Re: Porter 1203 TE

Will Gant November 01, 2017 11:20PM

Re: Porter 1203 TE

Mark Huber November 02, 2017 05:55AM

Re: Porter 1203 TE

rehunn November 02, 2017 11:44AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login