Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: San Juan and Shavano

May 19, 2017 10:08AM avatar
In the late 1930's, The D&RGW did considerable business on passenger trains by hauling LCL (Less Than Carload) freight in baggage cars. In the late 1930's it was common to a couple of extra baggage cars on the head end of the train ahead of the RPO car.

Eventually the unions put an end to this, as handling freight was not part of the duties of a passenger train brakeman. The unions demanded extra pay for the brakeman on the train as well as pay for the freight brakeman whose job had been taken by the passenger brakeman. The Rio Grande's answer to the problem was to simply stop handling LCL on the passenger trains. This increased the losses for running the trains and added more ammunition to their eventual quest to get rid of the passenger trains.
Subject Author Posted

San Juan and Shavano

traintalk May 15, 2017 09:45PM

Re: San Juan and Shavano

Earl May 16, 2017 08:39AM

Re: San Juan and Shavano

hank May 16, 2017 08:53AM

Re: San Juan and Shavano Attachments

sbruss66 May 30, 2017 10:20AM

Re: San Juan and Shavano

Earl May 16, 2017 08:54AM

Re: San Juan and Shavano

CharlieMcCandless May 16, 2017 10:50AM

Re: San Juan and Shavano

John K May 16, 2017 07:49PM

Re: K-28's on San Juan, Shavano, etc. in 1939 & '40 Attachments

Russo Loco May 18, 2017 08:18PM

Re: K-28's on San Juan, Shavano, etc. in 1939 & '40 Attachments

BrianJ May 18, 2017 09:09PM

Re: K-28's on San Juan, Shavano, etc. in 1939 & '40

Tomstp May 19, 2017 10:01AM

Re: San Juan and Shavano

Earl May 19, 2017 10:08AM

Re: San Juan and Shavano

Jim McKee May 19, 2017 10:36AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login