Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 168 and 315

January 31, 2017 11:00AM avatar
Yes, a wee bit up grade from the present Coxo highway crossing. Yes, that is a snowshed in the distance.

I saw this pic years ago and I'm still impressed with it. It shows an interesting practice of using the "road engine" as the "helper" on the hill. I've also seen this practice on Cerro Summit. My take is they didn't want to put that much strain on the T12's wooden tender frame, the Mudhen was cut in behind it.

But, when you think about it, when they used C-class engines to help, it took the same amount of power from the second engine to help the T12 up the hill. Whether it was a C-19 or K-27, the same amount of power was needed to get up the hill on time. So, that theory doesn't hold much water.
Subject Author Posted

168 and 315

dougvv January 28, 2017 11:16PM

Re: 168 and 315

CharlieMcCandless January 29, 2017 04:14AM

Re: 168 and 315

dougvv January 29, 2017 04:25AM

Re: 168 and 315

hank January 29, 2017 07:26PM

Re: 168 and k-27 Attachments

davegrandt January 30, 2017 12:22PM

Re: 168 and k-27

dougvv January 30, 2017 12:31PM

Re: 168 and k-27

Jeff Ramsey January 30, 2017 10:55PM

Re: 168 and k-27

vince heying January 31, 2017 03:34AM

Re: 168 and k-27

Chris Walker January 31, 2017 04:56AM

Re: 168 and k-27

Wayne Hoskin January 31, 2017 05:12AM

Re: 168 and 315

Earl January 31, 2017 11:00AM

Re: 168 and 315

rdamurphy February 01, 2017 06:25PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login