Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: NPS & 278

December 02, 2016 09:48AM
That's good news, Rod! While the train was a dramatic display on the bridge in the canyon, it was a brutal environment for the equipment. I always felt that displaying it with the rest of the cars at Cimarron made more sense from both interpretive and preservation standpoints. The road down to the bridge could be an icy nightmare in the winter, so for half the year, you really had to want to see it to go there. A pavilion of some sort would be terrific!
Subject Author Posted

NPS & 278

BodieCalifornia December 01, 2016 10:37PM

Re: NPS & 278

larryjensen December 02, 2016 08:52AM

Re: NPS & 278

rod December 02, 2016 09:38AM

Re: NPS & 278

larryjensen December 02, 2016 09:48AM

Re: NPS & 278

rehunn December 02, 2016 11:29AM

Re: NPS & 278 Attachments

Ken Martin December 05, 2016 07:45AM

Re: NPS & 278 Attachments

Earl December 07, 2016 11:34AM

Re: NPS & 278

GeorgeGaskill December 07, 2016 08:22PM

Re: NPS & 278

jim pallow December 07, 2016 05:17PM

Re: NPS & 278

pd3463 December 07, 2016 08:32PM

Re: NPS & 278

Earl December 07, 2016 08:49PM

Re: NPS & 278

cdaspit December 07, 2016 09:00PM

Re: NPS & 278

74ford December 09, 2016 10:08PM

Re: NPS & 278

Earl December 07, 2016 09:19PM

Re: NPS & 278

D&RGW 223 December 07, 2016 10:32PM

Re: NPS & 0577 (link) Attachments

rod December 08, 2016 02:07AM

Re: NPS & 278

dougvv December 08, 2016 06:28AM

Re: NPS & 278

jalbers December 08, 2016 08:22AM

Re: NPS & 278

larryjensen December 08, 2016 09:46AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login