Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&TS runs despite fire danger

Wade Hall
June 02, 2000 03:19PM
Thanks, John, for the report. It seems popular these days to blame the "ignition source" (whatever it is) when a serious forest fire erupts. Unfortunately, that ignores the fact that many of our western forests, thanks to a hundred years of fire suppression and about a quarter century+ of "suppressed" logging, have a huge buildup of potential fuel ripe for ignition into a major conflagration during the next dry spell. Ironically, the higher areas around Cumbres are probably less likely to burn thanks to the 1879 fire that "opened up" much of the higher areas around the pass.
Fortunately (for the C&TS, at least), I think the most fire-prone area close to the railroad is the north-facing slope across the Rio de Los Pinos between Sublette and Rock Tunnel. There's a lot of insect-killed timber in there that's ripe to burn. It would be very difficult for a C&TS train to light that up, but dry lightning sure could do it under the right conditions. At least the railroad couldn't be blamed for that. A fire there would almost certainly lead to a train shutdown due to safety concerns.
A forester friend of mine summed it all up the other day: "You can either have logging, a controlled burn, or an uncontrolled burn. Your choice. If you don't do either the first or second, the third is eventually inevitable. That's nature."
Subject Author Posted

C&TS runs despite fire danger

John West June 02, 2000 01:53PM

Re: C&TS runs despite fire danger

Wade Hall June 02, 2000 03:19PM

fire danger

Douglas van Veelen June 03, 2000 11:42AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.