philip.marshall Wrote:
Well even if the bridge hasn't been scrapped,
which is good news, it still bothers me that it
was removed. The historical integrity of the
railroad has been damaged even if the object still
exists.
But of course, if the landowner wanted to get rid
of it and make some money then that's his or her
right.
Yes, the owner can do what he wants with his property but it's too bad that so many have no sense of what is important or historical. If the bridge were on my property I'd clean and paint it and have track back on it. Handcar rides anyone??
Stewart