Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: K-27's rebuilds

November 10, 2011 08:54AM
Dennis O'Berry's MUDHENS book is a good place to begin. A good overview of the history of this class.

The D&RG ordered the Class 125 locomotives in 1903 at a time when compounding was in vogue in North America. Delivered that same year, they were Vauclain compounds, using saturated steam. Saturated steam had been the industry standard from the time of Trevethick and Stephenson, though by 1903 some theorists were considering superheating steam. Theoretically, using the steam twice before exhausting it up the stack provided efficiency by getting more work out of each pound of coal and water. In fact, there were measurable savings, but the economics of railroading were very different in Europe and North America. In really crude, over-simplified terms, fuel was expensive in Europe, while skilled labor was relatively inexpensive; in the USA the opposite situation applied - fuel was relatively inexpensive, and skilled crafts - shop men, engine crews - were much more costly.

The D&RG found that the Class 125 locos did indeed produce more work than the smaller power, and compounding was helpful - but - the railroad tended to overwork the locomotives by putting more train behind them than they could easily handle. Enginemen responded by cheating - using the starting valve to admit high pressure steam into both the high pressure and low pressure cylinders. Acceptable for starting a train, it was hard on the machinery if the locomotive ran for extended distances with all four cylinders using high pressure steam. So trains got over the road, but the Class 125s started spending much more time in the shop.

After two years - in 1905 - the D&RG decided to try converting one of the Class 125s to a simple loco with what were then the standard slide valves. The locomotive was to remain a saturated steam loco, probably for reasons of economy - keep the conversion cost down. All of the narrow gauge power used saturated steam and slide valves, this would be a return to the tried and true technology. The simpled Class 125 was more robust, and spent less time in th3e shop, so the management deiced to do all of them on a gradual basis. O'Berry notes that records indicate it was not a rapid process, with the last Class 125 being simpled sometime between 1912 and 1916.

Another fuel saving technology was under development in 1903. Superheating the steam, so that it was a hotter gas, and would provide more work per pound - and would allow the use of less fuel per mile. Superheat, however, required different valves to work effectively - the slide valves were not as desirable as piston valves. By 1910 most new main line power came with piston valves, and more and more railroads were recognizing that superheat and piston valves attained fuel efficiencies more or less comparable to compounding and saturated steam. In North America, where coal was inexpensive, and skilled labor costly, the compromise of superheat and piston valves, but simple engines proved to be the economically preferred combination. [We won't worry about Mallets - another topic for another day, but note that the L-131s, like the NP Yellowstones and UP Big Boys were all simples]

After World War I the D&RG was in financial trouble, and in 1921 it w2as reorganized as the D&RGW. The new company set about making improvements which it hoped would lead to greater operating efficiency, and a return to profitability.

In 1923-1924 the first four of the soon to be Class K-27 were superheated by the D&RGW These proved to be more economical on fuel. The D&RGW gradually rebuilt another seven with piston valves, all but one with superheat. No. 462, the last piston valve conversion, in 1929, was never superheated. Four remained as saturated steamers with slide valves - 450, 451, 457, and 460. Business was down, the Rio Grande had the K-28 and K-36 class, both less than ten years old, so there was plenty of power for the main lines. Probably the conversion of the last four mudhens seemed pointless, with 20 relatively new superheated mikes on hand. Note that photos indicate that only 460 saw much service after 1929.

Charlie Mutschler
-30-
Subject Author Posted

K-27's rebuilds

davidtltc November 09, 2011 11:57PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

CharlieMcCandless November 10, 2011 05:47AM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

Gavin Hamilton November 10, 2011 08:30AM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

Charlie Mutschler November 10, 2011 08:54AM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

trainrider47 November 10, 2011 09:24AM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

nedsn3 November 10, 2011 09:42AM

Not WWII scrap

hank November 13, 2011 01:15AM

Thanks Hank

davidtltc November 13, 2011 12:40PM

Re: Not WWII scrap

nedsn3 November 14, 2011 04:20AM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

Donald Foster November 10, 2011 03:41PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

Wade Hall November 10, 2011 09:36AM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

nedsn3 November 10, 2011 10:42AM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

NGJunkie November 10, 2011 07:37PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

CharlieMcCandless November 11, 2011 03:08AM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

nedsn3 November 11, 2011 01:40PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

chamafun463 November 10, 2011 10:56AM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

Ed Stabler November 10, 2011 11:50AM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

nedsn3 November 10, 2011 12:37PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

Ed Stabler November 10, 2011 02:23PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

Bruce R. Pier November 10, 2011 02:37PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

Ron Nott November 10, 2011 10:41AM

Off Topic: reheaters

CharlieMcCandless November 10, 2011 11:25AM

Re: Off Topic: reheaters

John Cole November 10, 2011 11:32AM

Re: Off Topic: reheaters

CharlieMcCandless November 10, 2011 12:06PM

Re: Off Topic: reheaters

John Cole November 10, 2011 12:34PM

Thanks for your answers

davidtltc November 10, 2011 11:58AM

Re: Thanks for your answers

Mark Stoeckel November 10, 2011 02:56PM

455 runaway.

CharlieMcCandless November 10, 2011 04:06PM

Re: Thanks Again

davidtltc November 11, 2011 04:52PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

S.B.A. November 11, 2011 05:24PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds - First Four

Charlie Mutschler November 11, 2011 05:45PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds - First Four

nedsn3 November 11, 2011 06:05PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds - First Four

Earl November 13, 2011 10:16AM

Re: K-27's - First Four between 2nd & 3rd rebuild ... Attachments

Russo Loco November 13, 2011 01:05PM

Re: K-27's - First Four between 2nd & 3rd rebuild ...

nedsn3 November 14, 2011 04:28AM

Re: K-27's - First Four between 2nd & 3rd rebuild ...

Everett Lueck November 14, 2011 06:41AM

Re: K-27's - First Four between 2nd & 3rd rebuild ...

BillD November 19, 2011 05:02PM

Re: K-27's - First Four between 2nd & 3rd rebuild ...

Russo Loco November 28, 2011 08:26PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds - First Four

Charlie Mutschler November 13, 2011 02:10PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds - First Four

Marty Knox November 13, 2011 04:25PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds - First Four

John Bush November 18, 2011 06:00AM

Re: K-27's rebuilds - First Four

Russo Loco November 28, 2011 08:35PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

Bill Scobie November 11, 2011 06:06PM

Compounding

CharlieMcCandless November 11, 2011 07:28PM

Re: Compounding

nedsn3 November 12, 2011 12:14PM

Re: Compounding

Jim Grigsby November 13, 2011 09:37AM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

Kelly Anderson November 16, 2011 07:58PM

Re: K-27's rebuilds

nedsn3 November 17, 2011 07:10AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login