Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

February 18, 2011 11:56PM
The usual operating proceedure was to have two locomotives on the front and one on the back on three-engine trains. The couplers can stand only so much pull so the railroads have to place engines in the train to balance the forces.
A general rule of thumb is that it takes (IIRC) two pounds of tractice force to get a ton of freight moving. When the grade is increased the tractive effort needs is increased by 20 pounds per ton per percent of grade. A 500-ton train would need 42,500 pounds of tractive force on a 4 percent grade. Curves also are taken into account.
The couplers are rated for the amound of tractive force they can take before they break. If the tractive force exceeds this, engines have to go elsewhere on the train. Special instructions in the employee timetable direct when midtrain or rear-end helpers are placed.
To make a long story short there was no operational need for triple headers.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/18/2011 11:57PM by CharlieMcCandless.
Subject Author Posted

C&TSRR Triple Header Question

chamafun463 February 18, 2011 10:51PM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

CharlieMcCandless February 18, 2011 11:56PM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

Earl February 19, 2011 08:53AM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

Russo Loco February 19, 2011 09:56AM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

dwsabianguy February 25, 2011 12:15PM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

Russo Loco February 25, 2011 05:26PM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

gothpapa February 25, 2011 06:27PM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

Earl February 26, 2011 08:58AM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

gothpapa February 26, 2011 09:12AM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

John Bush February 19, 2011 07:21AM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

cdaspit February 19, 2011 07:30AM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

Sandiapaul February 24, 2011 05:25PM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

Earl February 19, 2011 08:49AM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

drgwk37 February 19, 2011 09:21AM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

Russo Loco February 19, 2011 10:09AM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

rick_b February 19, 2011 10:28AM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

BrianJ February 19, 2011 10:34AM

NNG - How about FIVE engines ... eye popping smiley Attachments

Russo Loco February 19, 2011 08:19PM

Re: NNG - How about FIVE engines?

chamafun463 February 19, 2011 09:56PM

Re: NNG - How about FIVE engines?

CharlieMcCandless February 19, 2011 11:59PM

Re: NNG - How about FIVE engines?

gothpapa February 24, 2011 09:40AM

Five engines in Chama Attachments

John Bush February 24, 2011 10:09AM

Re: Five engines in Chama

BrianJ February 24, 2011 01:34PM

Re: Five engines in Chama

Greg Scholl October 19, 2015 09:59PM

Re: NNG - How about FIVE engines?

chamafun463 February 24, 2011 11:41AM

Re: NNG - How about FIVE engines?

D&RGW 223 February 24, 2011 10:15AM

Re September 8th, 2001

Big Ed February 24, 2011 07:17PM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question Attachments

Scott Gibbs February 26, 2011 09:41PM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

chamafun463 February 27, 2011 08:10AM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question Attachments

BillD February 27, 2011 11:22AM

Re: C&TSRR Triple Header Question

chamafun463 February 27, 2011 12:36PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login