Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 1939 455 Trade For RGS Ditcher 030 Question?

January 03, 2011 10:33AM
Herb Kelsey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Rio Grande was setting
> them aside as they came up for repairs.

That was, as I understand it, more of a post-war policy.
1949 on.

> Their
> most common use was on the Silverton Branch and on
> loan to the RGS.

Pre-war also the Farmington branch, Cerro Summit, and switcher/CB branch helper at Gunnison. All jobs the 28's could take over, there being a looming surplus of them with the Santa Fe branch & Shavano slated to go soon, and probably would have if not sent to the White Pass in '42.

hank
Subject Author Posted

1939 455 Trade For RGS Ditcher 030 Question?

chamafun463 January 02, 2011 05:49PM

Re: 1939 455 Trade For RGS Ditcher 030 Question?

Jerry Day January 02, 2011 06:25PM

Re: 1939 455 Trade For RGS Ditcher 030 Question?

chamafun463 January 02, 2011 09:37PM

Re: 1939 455 Trade For RGS Ditcher 030 Question?

Jerry Day January 02, 2011 09:42PM

Re: 1939 455 Trade For RGS Ditcher 030 Question?

chamafun463 January 02, 2011 09:50PM

Re: 1939 455 Trade For RGS Ditcher 030 Question?

Earl January 02, 2011 10:51PM

Re: 1939 455 Trade For RGS Ditcher 030 Question?

Herb Kelsey January 03, 2011 02:54AM

Re: 1939 455 Trade For RGS Ditcher 030 Question?

hank January 03, 2011 10:33AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login