Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again...for MRowe

December 28, 2010 11:20PM
According to F. Hol Wanger, Jr.'s book, "The Colorado Road--History, Motive Power and Equipment of the Colorado & Southern and Fort Worth & Denver" (1970), the C&S approached Baldwin in 1930 to prepare specifications and cost figures for three simple articulated locomotives exerting 42,000 to 45,000 pounds of traffic effort. The only limiting factor set by the C&S was that the locomotives have tenders and not side tanks like the Uintah engines.

Baldwin came back with a proposal for three 2-6-6-2s similar to those built for the Rio Grande do Sul Railway of Brazil in 1925, but having tenders identical to those behind the D&RGW's K-36s! Approximate cost per engine was estimated at $48,000. Baldwin intimated that using three articulateds on the Clear Creek division instead of the six 2-8-0s used there at the time would provide cost savings of $17,472/year. Declines in business due to the Great Depression caused the purchase of any new power to be postponed indefinitely.

Business began to pick up again in 1934. The C&S again approached Baldwin, which came back with the same proposal, but with the price tag boosted to $56,500/locomotive. Serious consideration was given to the proposed purchase, but instead the railroad filed to abandon the South Park lines in 1935, obviating the need for additional/new power, and the order was never placed.

The Clear Creek line continued to operate until 1941, however, and so in 1938, when the Uintah was abandoned, the C&S briefly considered buying the Uintah's articulateds, which were for sale for $28,750 each, FOB Mack, CO. But it was determined that adding tenders would cost $6,750 each, $12,150 would have to be expended to reinforce bridges to handle the articulateds and that the high bridge on the Loop could not carry the articulateds, could not be reinforced to do so, and could not economically be replaced. An additional $60,000 would be needed to recondition the track. Since business was down to bi-weekly, the C&S ended its flirtation with articulated locomotives. The last of the narrow-gauge C&S was abandoned in 1941.

The foregoing information shamelessly cribbed from Mr. Wanger's book.

Mike
Subject Author Posted

IRCA 250 and 251 again Attachments

John West December 27, 2010 10:51PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

LOGGERHOGGER December 28, 2010 05:59AM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

Fred Folk December 28, 2010 10:27AM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

Beau Brandstetter December 28, 2010 11:23AM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

mikerowe December 28, 2010 11:30AM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

Beau Brandstetter December 28, 2010 11:37AM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

Tom Moungovan December 28, 2010 02:20PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

Will Gant December 28, 2010 05:45PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again Attachments

mikerowe December 28, 2010 06:16PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

Beau Brandstetter December 28, 2010 06:18PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again...for MRowe

Tom Moungovan December 28, 2010 07:24PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again...for MRowe

mikerowe December 28, 2010 07:36PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again...for MRowe

weston1879 December 28, 2010 09:48PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again...for MRowe

mikerowe December 28, 2010 11:20PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again...for MRowe

El Skonk December 29, 2010 01:11AM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again...for MRowe

Steve Singer December 29, 2010 07:41AM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again...for MRowe

El Skonk December 29, 2010 08:12AM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again...for MRowe

GeorgeGaskill December 29, 2010 03:03PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again...for MRowe

Jeff A. December 29, 2010 03:35PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again...for MRowe

weston1879 December 29, 2010 06:59PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again...for MRowe

El Skonk December 29, 2010 07:08PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again...for MRowe

Jeff A. December 29, 2010 08:02PM

Re: Replica 2-6-6-2

Tim Bain December 31, 2010 08:22PM

Re: Replica 2-6-6-2...to Tim

Tom Moungovan December 31, 2010 10:02PM

Re: Replica 2-6-6-2...to Tim

J.B.Bane December 31, 2010 10:55PM

Re: Replica 2-6-6-2

Gavin Hamilton January 05, 2011 05:36AM

Re: Replica 2-6-6-2

weston1879 January 05, 2011 06:29PM

Re: Replica 2-6-6-2

mikerowe January 05, 2011 08:13PM

Re: Replica 2-6-6-2

jessica stacey January 05, 2011 08:24PM

Re: Replica 2-6-6-2

mikerowe January 06, 2011 12:42AM

Re: Replica 2-6-6-2

GeorgeGaskill January 06, 2011 07:03PM

View from Google

Adam Wright January 07, 2011 10:21PM

Re: Replica 2-6-6-2

Will Gant January 05, 2011 06:36PM

Re: Replica 2-6-6-2

Tim Bain January 06, 2011 01:49AM

Re: Replica 2-6-6-2

Curtis_F January 07, 2011 12:50PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again...for MRowe Attachments

Erik Priess December 29, 2010 09:57AM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

hwcwsl January 06, 2011 09:36PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again Attachments

jalbers January 07, 2011 10:52AM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

weston1879 January 07, 2011 11:40AM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

GeorgeGaskill January 07, 2011 01:30PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

hwcwsl January 07, 2011 04:41PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

weston1879 January 07, 2011 06:06PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

Tom Moungovan January 07, 2011 07:28PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

J.B.Bane January 07, 2011 09:32PM

Re: IRCA 250 and 251 again

hwcwsl January 07, 2011 10:04PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login