Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Insurance is Commission's Responsibility (repeat)

October 21, 2010 08:47AM
As usual there is confusion over responsibilities among the three entities involved in the C&TS. For the record, the agreement between the Commission and CTSMC specifically states that the Commission shall obtain and maintain personal liability insurance and fire and property damage insurance, and shall include the CTSMC as a "name insured" under the policies.

According to the agreement the liability coverage is required to be $10,000,000, which protects the CTSMC from the major risks of personal injury it faces in operating a tourist railroad.

As for fire and property insurance, that provision of the agreement has had far less importance for CTSMC because it owns very little property. However, the agreement does state unequivocally that the Commission agrees to keep $10,000,000 of coverage for fire and property damage to the railroad. Obviously, that did not happen, and the rest is history. Meanwhile funds have been found, for which much thanks are due to all involved.

As a historical note, this clause was also a part of the agreement that the old commission had with RGRPC. When that commission failed to obtain a policy that included RGRPC as a "name insured" the RGRPC board wisely decided to not operate the railroad any longer and vacated the premises because of the unacceptable risk.

Technically the old commission was in breech of the agreement, but, despite being fed up with such shenanigans by the old commission, RGRPC decided that enough was enough. Some months later the governors of the two states replaced the commissioners and CTSMC was formed.
Subject Author Posted

Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

Tomstp October 20, 2010 02:22PM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

Tom Platten October 20, 2010 02:27PM

Manna from Heaven?

El Nehi October 20, 2010 04:43PM

Re: Manna from Heaven?

Will Gant October 20, 2010 06:28PM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

Rich Muth October 20, 2010 02:32PM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

Rich Murray October 20, 2010 02:39PM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

jalbers October 20, 2010 03:28PM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

Kim Casford October 20, 2010 04:09PM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

Paul Grasha October 20, 2010 04:10PM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

Samart October 20, 2010 04:44PM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

Chris James October 20, 2010 07:46PM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

John Cole October 20, 2010 08:39PM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

Larry October 20, 2010 05:42PM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

Cliff Young October 20, 2010 11:24PM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

IanD October 21, 2010 01:32AM

Insurance is Commission's Responsibility (repeat)

Dick Cowles October 21, 2010 08:47AM

Re: Insurance is Commission's Responsibility (repeat)

IanD October 21, 2010 09:58AM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

OLCO107 October 21, 2010 01:10PM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

GeorgeGaskill October 21, 2010 03:35PM

Re: Goat saying NM to pay $1.1 million on Lobato

GeorgeGaskill October 21, 2010 03:29PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login