Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Lobato Design Assumption

September 10, 2010 08:54AM
As a bridge engineer, I reviewed the Lobato Bridge Rehabilitation Report by HDR and noticed one design assumption that concerned me. The load rating did not account for impact due to hammer blow of the engine due to the bridge being in a sag vertical curve and the train coasting on the tracks in this section. I envision this being the case 99.99% of the time, but what about an unlikely scenario that requires the train to slow or stop in this section of track and have to power up the backside of the slope (say if a something is on the track). Thoughts?
Subject Author Posted

Lobato Design Assumption

Nathan September 10, 2010 08:54AM

Re: Lobato Design Assumption

Etrump September 10, 2010 09:52AM

Re: Lobato Design Assumption

Tom Stewart September 10, 2010 10:08AM

Re: Lobato Design Assumption

Earl September 10, 2010 10:21AM

Re: Lobato Design Assumption

Tom Stewart September 10, 2010 10:42AM

Re: Lobato Design Assumption

Earl September 10, 2010 11:00AM

Re: Lobato Design Assumption

Gavin Hamilton September 11, 2010 09:58AM

Re: Lobato Design Assumption

bookemdanno October 02, 2010 06:26AM

Re: Lobato Design Assumption

El Nehi September 10, 2010 11:55AM

Re: Lobato Design Assumption

nedsn3 September 10, 2010 09:38PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login