Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Gunnison Division “X 30” August 24, 26 & 31, 1924

April 13, 2010 08:05AM
They were a unit in the sense that all the car number for a unit of oil was typed on one way-bill and the rate was based on multipal cars. They handled other traffic on those trains, as long as it did not add to the delay shown in these X-30 reports. In 1940 when they moved logs from Timber to interchange at Dolores to NML trains, they were on one way-bill, but other traffic was handled as well. The lumber company attempted to, and at one point had an agreement to run their own trains of logs with their own crews, but the RGS union agreement men would not let that happen. It was work they could handle and it was over their track covered by their agreement.
Subject Author Posted

Gunnison Division “X 30” August 24, 26 & 31, 1924

STUDENT April 08, 2010 06:31AM

Re: Gunnison Division “X 30” August 24, 26 & 31, 1924

tomc April 08, 2010 08:09PM

Re: Gunnison Division “X 30” August 24, 26 & 31, 1924

STUDENT April 10, 2010 10:25AM

Re: Gunnison Division “X 30” August 24, 26 & 31, 1924

tomc April 10, 2010 03:26PM

Re: Gunnison Division “X 30” August 24, 26 & 31, 1924

hank April 11, 2010 10:46AM

Re: Gunnison Division “X 30” August 24, 26 & 31, 1924

tomc April 11, 2010 08:12PM

Re: Gunnison Division “X 30” August 24, 26 & 31, 1924

STUDENT April 12, 2010 07:38AM

Re: Gunnison Division “X 30” August 24, 26 & 31, 1924

John E. Bull April 13, 2010 08:05AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login