Welcome!
Log In
Create A New Profile
Home
>
Narrow Gauge Discussion Forum
> Topic
Advanced
Re: RGS 2-8-8-2
Previous Message
Next Message
Forum List
Message List
New Topic
Print View
Ed Stabler
December 01, 2009 05:13AM
Registered: 16 years ago
Posts: 2,129
Doug, I believe they would have been designated L-54 or L-75, as the "M" designation was used for 4-8-2s and 4-8-4s. However they would have been designated, they'd have been something to see and hear. -- Ed
Reply
Quote
Message List
Previous Message
Next Message
RSS
Subject
Author
Posted
RGS 2-8-8-2
dougvv
December 01, 2009 02:16AM
Re: RGS 2-8-8-2
Jeff Taylor
December 01, 2009 02:26AM
Re: RGS 2-8-8-2
Ed Stabler
December 01, 2009 05:13AM
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Click here to login