Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: RGS 2-8-8-2

December 01, 2009 05:13AM avatar
Doug, I believe they would have been designated L-54 or L-75, as the "M" designation was used for 4-8-2s and 4-8-4s. However they would have been designated, they'd have been something to see and hear. -- Ed
Subject Author Posted

RGS 2-8-8-2

dougvv December 01, 2009 02:16AM

Re: RGS 2-8-8-2

Jeff Taylor December 01, 2009 02:26AM

Re: RGS 2-8-8-2

Ed Stabler December 01, 2009 05:13AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login