Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: RGS #20 frame

April 21, 2009 11:03AM avatar
Present day lack of understanding would dictate not using the boiler as part of the frame, notwithstanding the fact that it worked fine for many years. I believe it can be done successfully on such a small locomotive if proper reinforcement beyond that needed to hold pressure is provided. My first choice would be to try to have a through frame without totally redesigning the engine. From a practical standpoint, any more stresses and strains added to the boiler should be avoided.

All that being said, I am not familiar with a rule prohibiting the construction. The ASME code provides for structural reinforcement of boilers subject to outside loads but I don't recall any prohibition. It could be jurisdictional.
Subject Author Posted

RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger April 16, 2009 09:10AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Donald April 16, 2009 09:34AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Curtis_F April 16, 2009 09:49AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Samart April 16, 2009 10:59AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Will Gant April 16, 2009 02:40PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger April 17, 2009 07:53AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

CodyAkin April 17, 2009 09:18AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

DWBrown April 17, 2009 12:28PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger April 17, 2009 02:59PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Ted miles April 20, 2009 10:35AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Will Gant April 20, 2009 10:41AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger April 21, 2009 11:03AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

myork April 20, 2009 11:41AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Eric Bolton April 20, 2009 01:24PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Wayne Laepple April 20, 2009 02:58PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

robert yuill April 20, 2009 07:05PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login