Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: USA 3000 and USA 4700n

April 12, 2009 12:35PM avatar
Agreed, Dan, with the D&RGW situation. I doubt very much that the narrow gauge would have lasted longer than it did, even if dieselized. Another good point for keeping it steam operated is that they had plenty of locomotives to cannibalize for spare parts since they likely would need fewer and fewer in operating condition as time wore on.

You raise an interesting question regarding the D&RGW's contacting EMD for a proposal for custom ng diesels in the early 60's instead of GE with its readily available three-foot designs. EMD's units would very likely have cost a good deal more than GE's, which makes me wonder if the D&RGW wasn't using that as a ploy to assist them with abandonment.

Can't comment about the SP.

Ed
Subject Author Posted

USA 3000 and USA 4700n

CraigjP April 11, 2009 05:53PM

Re: USA 3000 and USA 4700n

Dan Robirds April 11, 2009 06:29PM

Re: USA 3000 and USA 4700n

Bill M. April 11, 2009 08:52PM

Re: USA 3000 and USA 4700n

South Park April 11, 2009 11:04PM

Re: USA 3000 and USA 4700n

K-27 Afficianado April 12, 2009 03:03AM

Re: USA 3000 and USA 4700n

Ed Stabler April 12, 2009 06:10AM

Re: USA 3000 and USA 4700n

Southern Pacific Narrow Gauge Tyler April 12, 2009 07:31AM

Re: USA 3000 and USA 4700n

Ed Stabler April 12, 2009 08:20AM

Re: USA 3000 and USA 4700n

Dan Robirds April 12, 2009 11:25AM

Re: USA 3000 and USA 4700n

Ed Stabler April 12, 2009 12:35PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login