Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Surprised they worked as well as they did

Kevin
July 08, 2001 12:53PM
I am surprised the K-37's were as successful as they were. It has been my experience that anytime you cobble up something like a K-37 it doesn't work well.
K-36 running gear attached to a standard gauge boiler, tender, etc. Of course it wouldn't track as well, etc.
But they sure were nice looking (beauty is in the eye of the beholder) locomotives. I remember being a little boy when my grandfather and I made our first and my only trip to Chama. He let me stand and look at the 492 for a good 30 minutes.
It and the 478, which I rode behind on our D&S ride that trip - it was still under DRGW control, and my favorite DRGW locomotives.
Of course we spent almost the entire day in the Chama yard looking at everything.
Subject Author Posted

Fate of K-37's

Danny July 07, 2001 08:00PM

Re: Fate of K-37's

Grant Houston July 07, 2001 08:07PM

Re: Fate of K-37's

Herb Kelsey July 07, 2001 08:18PM

Re: Fate of K-37's

John Templeton July 08, 2001 05:52AM

Re: Fate of K-37's

Trevor Hartford July 08, 2001 08:32AM

Surprised they worked as well as they did

Kevin July 08, 2001 12:53PM

490's Retirement - Whoops!

Herb Kelsey July 08, 2001 03:22PM

Re: 490's Retirement - Whoops!

John templeton July 08, 2001 04:36PM

Re: 490's Retirement - Whoops!

Gregory Raven July 08, 2001 05:19PM

Re: 490's Retirement - Whoops!

John Templeton July 08, 2001 07:01PM

Re: 490's Retirement - Whoops!

Gregory Raven July 08, 2001 09:15PM

New Buffalo Commune

El Coke July 08, 2001 04:39PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.