Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: #9 - Why NOT Breckenridge?

July 04, 2008 12:54PM
What does Breckenridge want her for? Is she supposed to be essentially a static display (except for pushing her 150 ft back and forth a couple of times a year?) If so, make her what she was: a COAL BURNER! Either way, there needs to be a provision that the ownership of the #9 transfers AWAY from the CHS!!!
Subject Author Posted

Re: #9 - Why NOT Breckenridge?

Russo Loco July 03, 2008 06:11PM

Re: #9 - Why NOT Breckenridge?

Rick Steele July 03, 2008 08:20PM

Re: #9 - Why NOT Breckenridge?

dougvv July 03, 2008 08:37PM

Re: #9 - Why NOT Breckenridge?

hank July 04, 2008 11:22AM

Re: #9 - Why NOT Breckenridge?

Steve Stockham July 04, 2008 12:54PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login