Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Breckenridge wants C&S #9 in 2009 (and no Loop steam until at least July)

May 28, 2008 03:16PM avatar
Last week, the Clear Creek Courant newspaper had an article titled "Loop set to open Saturday with diesel engine" posted:
Clear Creek Courant: Loop Set to Open Saturday with Diesel Engine

The article indicated that there will not be any steam operations at the Georgetown Loop until at least July.

The article also said that the operator plans on using the Loop's #21 diesel locomotive as a backup, but last year the same operator chose to completely shut down the Loop instead of using #21. While I have not had time to search the NGDF's archives, my recollection is that they chose to shutdown the Loop rather than use #21 because #21 had repeatedly derailed.

Since the article was published, I read on another site that #21 had to pull trains all Memorial Day weekend because there were problems with #1203. I don't know any details of what happened, nor can I even confirm those reports about problems with #1203 and #21 being used.

Meanwhile, the Summit Daily News ran an article titled "Breckenridge aims for Locomotive No. 9 in 2009 - Town, heritage alliance desire temporary placement for anniversary":

Summit Daily News: Breckenridge aims for Locomotive No. 9 in 2009

The article quotes town spokesperson Kim DiLallo as having said “The agreement with the (Colorado) Historical Society is that they will give us No. 9 if we will run it — we’re saying we plan to do that — but we want it in place for the 150th anniversary,”


--
Chris Webster
[www.speakeasy.org]
Subject Author Posted

Breckenridge wants C&S #9 in 2009 (and no Loop steam until at least July)

Chris Webster May 28, 2008 03:16PM

Re: Breckenridge wants C&S #9 in 2009 (and no Loop steam until at least July)

Dan Robirds May 28, 2008 05:31PM

Re: Breckenridge wants C&S #9 in 2009 (and no Loop steam until at least July)

South Park May 28, 2008 08:18PM

Re: Breckenridge wants C&S #9 in 2009 (and no Loop steam until at least July)

Chris Webster May 28, 2008 09:17PM

Re: Breckenridge wants C&S #9 in 2009 (and no Loop steam until at least July)

WW5252 May 29, 2008 12:07AM

Re: Breckenridge wants C&S #9 in 2009 (and no Loop steam until at least July)

ND Holmes May 28, 2008 09:35PM

Re: Breckenridge wants C&S #9 in 2009 (and no Loop steam until at least July)

Dan Robirds May 28, 2008 09:50PM

Re: Breckenridge wants C&S #9 in 2009 (and no Loop steam until at least July)

South Park May 28, 2008 11:23PM

Re: ROW Changes Attachments

Tim Bain May 29, 2008 01:07AM

Re: Breckenridge wants C&S #9 in 2009 (and no Loop steam until at least July)

dougvv May 29, 2008 01:21AM

Re: Breckenridge wants C&S #9 in 2009 (and no Loop steam until at least July)

Tim Schreiner May 29, 2008 08:08AM

Re: Tractive Effort

Dan Robirds May 29, 2008 09:20AM

Re: Tractive Effort

South Park May 29, 2008 08:15PM

Re: priorities

Jeff Badger May 30, 2008 08:46AM

Re: Photo(s) of diseasel #21, please.

Russo Loco May 30, 2008 07:34PM

Re: Photo(s) of diseasel #21, please. Attachments

Dick Bell May 30, 2008 09:46PM

Re: Diseasel #21 Derailment(s) - a possible reason ...

Russo Loco May 30, 2008 10:51PM

Re: Diseasel #21 Derailment(s) - a possible reason ...

dougvv May 31, 2008 01:34AM

Re: Diseasel #21 Derailment(s) - a possible reason ...

Sam May 31, 2008 11:42AM

Re: Diseasel #21 Derailment(s) - a possible reason ...

Dan Robirds May 31, 2008 02:14PM

Re: Diseasel #21 Derailment(s) - a possible reason ...

dougvv May 31, 2008 02:55PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login