Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

January 12, 2008 11:58AM
Paul Dalleska Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Comparing 464 to Bachmans model the model is
> almost dead on the real 464 as far as the large
> details. The small details are different, that's
> what 50 years will get you. It's a fine model for
> the price.
>
> Oh, it's big.
>
> Really big!

And has Lee Riley offered up a sample for display in the office of the CMO of the Huckleberry Railroad????

grinning smiley Steve

More serious comment. For all the models Bachmann has sold of Ely-Thomas Shay #5, the prototype is still a boiler on frame mess in Green Bay, and the manager of the musuem says they never received as much as a model of the locomotive for display. And a recent discussion with the man who put up the money to restore the Alder Gulch locomotive says he does not have a model of it in his office either.

I worked for a commuter agency that worked with Atlas who did some models. In exchange for 12 sample models and a simple signed release they got permission to model our equipment. No fancy UP or CSX deal. I am not saying that the model manufactureres are responsible for restoring the euqipment they model. I just think they should give better credit and due; however.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/12/2008 12:03PM by szuiderveen.
Subject Author Posted

Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

dan January 12, 2008 09:48AM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

drgwk37 January 12, 2008 10:02AM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

dan January 12, 2008 10:33AM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

drgwk37 January 12, 2008 10:38AM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

Paul Dalleska January 12, 2008 10:48AM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

szuiderveen January 12, 2008 11:58AM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

trainrider47 January 12, 2008 04:12PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

dan January 12, 2008 12:47PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

San Juan January 12, 2008 02:15PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

olarmy January 12, 2008 09:03PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

San Juan January 12, 2008 10:45PM

Re: Two Green K-37s - maybe more

Russo Loco January 17, 2008 05:28PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

Chris Webster January 15, 2008 06:33PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

Eric Bolton January 15, 2008 08:41PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

GeorgeGaskill January 15, 2008 11:05PM

Re: Bachmann K27- minimum radius, H & W dimensions?

up3985slrg1744 January 16, 2008 08:42AM

Re: Bachmann K27- minimum radius, H & W dimensions?

dan January 16, 2008 11:40AM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

Anonymous User January 16, 2008 12:36PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

superfleet January 16, 2008 01:06PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

Thor Windbergs January 16, 2008 04:45PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

Anonymous User January 17, 2008 11:11AM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

dan January 17, 2008 02:11PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

geode January 17, 2008 04:34PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

Anonymous User January 17, 2008 06:46PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

dan January 17, 2008 07:09PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

dan January 17, 2008 07:12PM

Re: Bachmann K27-Modeling Content

grukon January 17, 2008 08:05PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login