Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Story of the Year: K-36 history settled - Black 9.99, Green 0.01

December 30, 2007 10:42PM avatar
IMHO, The D&RGW K-36 green-jacket question has been settled.

Earl's records show that the K-36s were delivered by Baldwin not with the green jackets customary at the time, but with black jackets.

Jerry's records show that, with only one exception, there is no evidence that the D&RGW shop crews in either Alamosa or Salida gave the K-36s green jackets.

The one exception is #489, which is reportedly shown in photos and in at least one color movie as having had a dark-green jacket for a short time per a request by the Rocky Mountain Railroad Club to have special paint for an excursion in either 1949 or 1950.* I presume that the D&RGW did not go to the expense of repainting her immediately after said excursion, and that her jacket remained in green paint for a few months at least. (As this green paint would have quickly been covered with soot and road grime, she probably looked green for only very a short time.)

Since #489 spent over forty years - about 500 months - in D&RGW service with a black jacket, and only a few months at most in green (say five, just to keep the math simple), then she spent only about one percent of her D&RGW years in green. Thus, for the ten K-36s, Black defeats Green 9.99 to 0.01 in the history arena.

The ten "new" K-37s were apparently equipped by Burnham Shops in 1929-30 with green jackets. How long the K-37s retained their green jackets is not known. The argument debate as to whether C&TS #489, or any other K-36 being operated by either the C&TS or the D&S, should have a green jacket is a matter of opinions. To summarize a couple of them:

1) The C&TS should replicate the D&RGW as closely as possible.
PRO:
The C&TS is on the National Register of Historic Places, and it's charter requires that it replicate history as exactly as possible within the constraints of safety and the practical aspects of restoration, preservation and operation. [Which era(s) of D&RGW history to replicate is itself a hot topic of debate.]
CON: The C&TS is an active tourist railway, created by the two states in part to enhance economic development in the area. It is dependent on ridership for a significant portion of its funding. Unlike the EBT and the NN, it's name has changed. Use of the D&RGW name or the Rio Grande logo could cause confusion among potential future customers viewing their friends' slides or movies if they remember the name on the engine and later try to contact the RR for reservations. In addition, use of the D&RGW name and the Rio Grande logo for other than occasional historic recreations ("photo freights") would likely require the additional expense of licensing them from "the railroad formerly known as 'Uncle Pete'" (currently better referred to as 'Uncle Scrooge').

2) Black is the traditional color for railroad locomotives. Anything else creates a circus atmosphere and should be avoided.
PRO:
Most of us lucky enough to remember steam locomotives in regular service saw them painted black. Everybody expects engines to be black.
CON: Prior to 1900, most locomotives were NOT plain black. Even after 1900 and prior to the depression, many locomotives were not entirely black. Black became prominent during the depression and WWII as a cost-saving measure, but even then a great many railroads painted their premier passenger locomotives very colorfully. NYC 20th Century Hudsons, Milwaukee Road Hiawathas, Southern PS-4s (and 4-8-2s), SP Daylights (and 4-8-2s), CP's Royal Hudsons & Selkirk 2-10-4s and Santa Fe's "Blue Goose" are only a few examples. D&RGW's premier standard gauge passenger power had dark-green jackets in the 1930s, as did numerous other engines throughout the U.S.

Will equipping #489 with a dark-green jacket when her restoration is completed in a few months attract additional riders (and foamers) to the C&TS? There's only one way to find out ...

- El Curmudgeono Viejo y Verde

* If anyone reading this can post date(s) and/or color photo(s) of #489 and #499s "green" excursions in 1949 or 1950, it would be greatly appreciated. Also, did #489 have the "flying" Rio Grande lettering or the "classic" Denver & Rio Grande Western roman lettering on her tender (with or without the "bug" logo?) for the excursion(s)?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/31/2007 12:49AM by Russo Loco.
Subject Author Posted

Story of the Year: K-36 history settled - Black 9.99, Green 0.01

Russo Loco December 30, 2007 10:42PM

Re: Story of the Year: K-36 history settled - Black 9.99, Green 0.01

michael December 30, 2007 11:00PM

Re: Tri-colored herald Attachments

ROW Explorer December 31, 2007 10:09AM

Re: Story of the Year: K-36 history settled - Black 9.99, Green 0.01

michael December 30, 2007 11:03PM

Re: Story of the Year: K-36 history settled - Black 9.99, Green 0.01

Russo Loco December 31, 2007 12:25AM

Re: Story of the Year: K-36 history settled - Black 9.99, Green 0.01

Anonymous User December 31, 2007 12:47AM

Re: Story of the Year: K-36 history settled - Black 9.99, Green 0.01

Russo Loco December 31, 2007 01:04AM

Re: Story of the Year: K-36 history settled - Black 9.99, Green 0.01

Ed Stabler December 31, 2007 05:55AM

Re: Story of the Year: K-36 history settled - Black 9.99, Green 0.01

Anonymous User December 31, 2007 11:48AM

Re: Story of the Year: K-36 history settled - Black 9.99, Green 0.01

michael December 31, 2007 09:00AM

Re: Green tinted glasses & strawman alert - winking smiley

Scott Turner December 31, 2007 09:38AM

Re: Green tinted glasses & strawman alert - winking smiley

geode December 31, 2007 06:48PM

Re: Green tinted glasses & strawman alert - winking smiley

michael December 31, 2007 08:57PM

Re: ONE green example - NOT a standard

Russo Loco January 01, 2008 07:09AM

Re: ONE green example - NOT a standard

Scott Turner January 01, 2008 10:02AM

Re: ONE green example - NOT a Grinch!

Russo Loco January 02, 2008 06:52PM

Re: ONE green example - NOT a Grinch!

michael January 02, 2008 09:26PM

Re: ONE green example - NOT a standard

geode January 01, 2008 10:03AM

Re: ONE green example - NOT a standard

michael January 01, 2008 10:06AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login